More humid in NYC, but more rain in Switzerland. I think I saw stats once that Zurich has alot more rain than London.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/world/c...ml?tt=TT003790
Interesting comparing Zurich to London, I would have thought based on word of mouth that London had way way more rain, I think this just proves that the English like to complain alot . Enough of my thread hijack.
However, London isn't the U.K. and some parts, notably the North and some of the West are very wet compared with the South East.
Not typical of the "UK"
Yours,
Disgusted from Manchester and former resident of Moray
(That's a wee bit past Lakeside for you shandy drinkers)
Zurich is dry in winter and humid in summer. Seriously.
I agree that chilled beam systems are more efficient for air conditioning. You're comparing a pump to a compressor, very simple.
As for heating, there I still a simple energy balance. When you heat the air with forced air, you also heat the walls and floors, you're still putting the same amount of energy into the system, but you're keeping it further from leaving the desired heating area. A warm radiating floor will radiate outside as well, not to mention through the windows a lot easier than convective heat.
That being said, I am coming from a Canadian background where heating might be a bit more important than say austrailia.