After three pages with many posts with dismissive comments, the person who had asked this still has not been responded to. So my post was intended to do exactly that: Yes, there seems to be a very similar alert system in Switzerland, and I provided a link to it.
This was followed by my request for people who have no interest in this topic to please ignore this, for those of us who are parents I personally consider this a good initiative.
I am really surprised about the amount of negative comments, some of them perhaps intended to be funny, some of them clearly not, why waste your time here if you don't want to contribute? Of course we all don't have to agree but opinions can be expressed in a civilized, not dismissive, way.BTW some of us do have children, who may be still small to even contemplate any "fending off" a potential attacker..
However, I think badly worded, unsubstantiated posts - i.e. PDC's - that constitute fearmongering, are counter-productive.
Someone tried to persuade our neighbours' 5yr old girl into his car on her 100m walk back from Kindergarten towards the end of last year (may have been this Child "Kidnapper" hovering around schools in the Baden area ) but she screamed at him and ran home before he managed to grab her. The police were involved but I couldn't find any "evidence" in the news about it at the time. Not everything makes it to an official news report.
If teachers are warning kids and parents that there's a higher than normal risk of abduction then presumably they're not just doing it for shits and giggles. Personally I'd always prefer to know about something like that in the area I live in, even without the supporting news report.
Size is irrelevant when "fending off" an attacker, plenty full grown adults have been kidnapped. Children should be taught the skills to recognise a bad situation, who they can trust, where to run to for help, to scream at the top of their lungs etc. Most of all it is important for us parents to keep things in perspective.
Quite often with these abduction cases the perpetrator in most cases is quite a simple individual/ psychologically confused and actually means the child no harm at all, and the police often find these vulnerable adults aimless walking around town with a bemused child.
If armed vigilantes were to track down a person in a situation described above what do you think the result would be? Not a pretty or appropriate result.
In conclusion The police do the job of finding the kid, and the parents should be vigilant, anything more inevitably leads to uncontrolled mayhem and in general more heinous crimes.
http://www.lematin.ch/actu/pervers-c...riviera-399496
Also I registered for the sms child abduction alert, 2 weeks later the little Swiss twins went missing who incidently lived in the next building to me and I received nothing!
The notification should work if there is a confirmed or strong evidence of a child abduction. Those in the immediate area of the abduction get warned first.
1. Parents get warned individually by SMS. There's not exactly a critical mass to form a vigilante mob such as that could happen, for example, after loud-speaker recordings from vans driving around the neighbourhood warning people to watch out for a bloke with a long ginger beard and a raincoat.
2. Schools will get warned as part of the system so teachers and other staff can be on there guard.
This is surely better than a constant state of fear.
@ Aluska - I think the confusion is that PDC's new thread from earlier in the week was merged into an old thread from 2007 - you responded with (probably the first) solid answer to the 2007 question, but everyone else is responding to PDC's rather generic rumour.
However, an alert system is not going to be of any benefit if it gets over-used and goes off everyday because a parent has taken the children off for the day which apparently is usually the case, even when the Police have been informed.
Laws and preventative measures against crime must not be based on a single case.