But there should be much better communication in advance about who is paying what in exactly which circumstances, especially if it is obvious that the work could be carried out for 20 francs by the tenant, whilst the owner will hire someone and the bill is then 200 francs. This is why I said it needed to be discussed prior to the work being carried out.
Agreed. But then you get disagreements, which is why you see articles on this sort of thing in consumer magazines, due often to poor communication and then high invoices popping up unexpectedly.
Let say the toilet seat was CHF 50, that leaves a not-unreasonable balance of CHF 150 for the labour and travel. CHF 200 for a tradesman to come and do it is not cheap but not THAT stratospheric either.
I don't think you were stupid. You maybe shouldn't have assumed it would be covered on the warranty but you live and learn.
Labour is expensive here which really bumps up the price. It's amazing how adept you get with a few basic tools and a YouTube tutorial. I can replace a heart valve, tune a piano and cook a perfect soufflé now...
If the OP has legal insurance I would say fight it out of principle, but otherwise he risks to have a lot of hassle for 200 Swissies and should ask himself if it is worth it.
Another question, the bill, payable within 30 days, is dated 5 August, and we received the letter on 23 august only. The postal stamp on the envelop shows 22 august.
Then I would assume that the 30 days start from the reception of the letter, and not the printed date on the bill. Am I right?