Which bank? You could try UBS, they might let you set up a retirement account.
The issue seems to be that with a managed Pillar 3 account there is the risk (for the bank) that some investments made might be those not allowed for Americans.
But not such a big deal, as Pillar 3 is often tax-ineffective for Americans.
---
If one decides to hold on to the blue passport (as we must ) one might consider whether moving the bulk of one's assets back to the US is a sensible move, or not. For many this is a workable solution.
We bank with one of the 'Big 2' here and with it's US branch as well. We keep most of our accounts in the US, leaving only enough in CH for expected needs. The CH and US entities are separate despite the shared name, and transition between two branches is a bit cumbersome, but on the whole it works for us.
just read through the Posts and have the paperwork on my table and a deadline for Oct. 25th to seliver or get my account closed down.
I'm not required to pay tax in US since I have never lived or worked ther but have the blue passport
Simple Question: Is there away around signing the papers or is it essential - period.
Reason for asking is - I just don't like being forced to do things where I see no necessity....
Thanks
Will
And for the Credit Suisse forms - well, if you don't sign, they kick you out, which they write pretty clearly in the letter.
As anowheels says, regardless of whether you owe the US any tax money, you still have to file US tax returns. It’s required by US law and because the US bases its tax system on citizenship, not residency, it doesn’t matter whether you’re living in the US or elsewhere. So long as you’re a US citizen you must file and possibly pay US tax.
All banks will require you to sign a W-9 so it’s either do that or lose your account/s. It’s part of the FATCA law that they do so.
The only other way to avoid signing up, providing you have a second citizenship, is to renounce or relinquish your US citizenship so you are no longer an American. Difficult with your tight deadline, but if you get on to the US embassy straightaway to make an appointment to do this, then you could tell your bank and they may give you an extension while you go through the process. The embassy here in Switzerland is pretty quick in dealing with the whole process so you should get your CLN (Certificate of Loss of Nationality) in a few months. Once you have that, it’s proof for the bank that you’re no longer a US citizen so have no need to sign a W-9.
Be thankful that signing a W-9 is all that Credit Suisse are asking for at present. A while ago I read a post that they were requiring all US clients to also provide proof that they’d done their US tax filing via a US tax preparer. Otherwise they were closing accounts. That was a while ago though so maybe they’ve changed their requirements.
Tom
Ooops, forgot that point Tom, thanks.
Any account/s you have in Switzerland though where the individual total or aggregate total comes to the equivalent of $10,000 or more has to be reported on a FBAR form. That applies to any other accounts you hold outside of the US too.
In my experience, not only is the heimatort/place of origin there, but the place of birth is also on the chip. It is one of the "fields" one needs to verify when going for a passport renewal.
So when US customs does the swipe, no need to look at the text, and all this info is clearly there for them to see. And having a US place of birth is one of the FATCA indices.
The CNL is the new ticket to freedom instead of the doomed little blue book
Or at least a copy of it. I wouldn’t travel with the original I don’t think. Keep it in a safe place. A copy should do for the border control as they can check the info on their computers. I already have a copy kept with my British passport.
http://www.chaeis.net/en/stiftung-au...htung-bvg.html
Also, the FATCA IGA with Switzerland specifically exempts this institution from FATCA reporting.
Good luck!
1) The FATCA Agreement between the US and Switzerland does not address FBAR.
2) The list of exempted financial institutions and instruments is on pp. 29-30 of the FATCA Agreement, which can be located as a .pdf by searching on "fatca agreement switzerland" in the internet.
3) Many consider Säule II pension fund assets to not be reportable on the FBAR because the taxpayer has no control over them. One might also view pension assets held at the Auffangeinrichtung in a Freizügigkeitskonto, which came from a Säule II, in the same way. The funds would normally have been transferred there via a trustee to trustee arrangement and so the individual has no access or control to them.
4) Finally, since there is no FATCA reporting of Säule II (as well as Säule III) pension assets, why bother the IRS with this useless information.
From what I can determine, the Auffangeinrichtung does not request the nationality of the individuals placing their pension assets with it.
Are all other US customers with PostFinance accounts having the same experience?
If so, how are you responding?