Where do people come from where they think a 500k chf house 20 mins from the centre of zurich is expensive? just take a look at the cost of a house 20 mins from the centre of london.
I assume, this is also to meet energy-saving requirements.
Short of the active ventilation with heat recovery, I think you are not allowed to build a house anymore below the minergie-standard (though you don't have to certify, if you don't want to).
I understand from my Dutch colleague that this is also common in the Netherlands.
The Swiss do not like paying wealth tax. If you don't own it, you don't pay tax on it .
There are also many sound reasons to follow the indirect amortization plan, but I don't think the banks are promoting it out of the goodness of their heart for the benefit of the consumer. It's easy money and they get it twice (constant interest payments plus the flow into the 3a that they pay a pittance on).
Quite what effect this will have is unclear - or even if it will be adopted. Presently you can offset mortgage interest against your tax liability without limit on as many properties as you want. Clearly some high-earners will be changing their property portfolio with this change in mind. But for the single home owner, this change will be neutral to positive depending on the size of mortgage, interest rate paid and amount of Eigenmietwert .
But if adopted, it will mean paying off a mortgage, especially if interest rates rise steeply is a more attractive proposition here. In the UK mortgage interest deductions were once capped at £30,000 pa (that's the mortgage value, not the interest) and have long since been abolished altogether...
http://www.immoscout24.ch/IS24Web/_V...003331&index=5
Put that house in any other country, ouside of a major city and no way would it sell for that price.
For the sub-1 Million stuff, yes, I looked long and hard, my max is actually only 600-700k and I couldn't find anything that said "yes" to me in that range. There were a few "maybes" but I thought about it, and dropping close to a million on a "maybe" didn't feel right and I passed on it. Alot of these also looked good in the advertisement, but when I went to see it in person, it was next to a garbage dump or a brothel, or on a steep slope with no yard, etc...
Anyway, my main point was that the system here makes owning unattractive compared to renting, and that the ones who do own their homes, basically never pay off the loan. And this system goes contrary to most of the rest of the civilized world.
...and yet I can (literally) hear my upstars neighbor fart, sneeze and pee in my "high quality, Swiss-built" apartment...
If a property is advertised there for more than a couple of weeks, I'd say it was over-priced or there were some other problems with it. Homegate charge per day and advertisers can remove their ads within an hour or two so there's no other reason for a property to remain there for a long time.
Homegate update their listings (or did check their site for the latest info) at 6am midday and 6pm. So you can see if any new properties come on the market then. But better still register with homegate and get them to email details of new ads to your specification as soon as they are published...
That's completely irrelevant. The house is here in this market.
How long are you planning to be here? It doesn't sound like you'll be here long. So it's probably not the best idea to buy.
If you buy right and sell right, you'll make a nice profit (don't rush too much or you'll get taxed rotten).
We now own two places; one to rent out in a postcode snobbery area and one we bought for 75% of market value because the sellers were slightly, erm, how do I put it.....dumb. Their idea of a quick sale was to not list the place on the open market
My repayments and NK on two properties is less than the rent I was paying on a 4.5 room apartment (which was my last rental). That includes amortisation.
There is little perceived value in owning due to difference in taxes here, though value can be found particularly with the current mortgage rates. Probably the number of Swiss who go abroad for a time and the number of foreigners who are here temporarily, both rather high percentages, play into the low rate; ownership only makes sense in the long term in most non-bubble markets.
Demand is high, supply is low. Prices are high, but not unreasonably so - it's what the market will bear. I, for example, can easily afford a decent place as a single man at the age of 31, and I'm far from the most successful person in this country. It may be that you're not making that much compared to your home country, and therefore the prices seem high to you, but given the higher wages here, that's not the case for a lot of us; we just don't all see a big benefit to owning.
2. Many Swiss buy apartments because it works out to be cheaper if you can pay 20% on the initial sales price and get a mortgage on the rest. Apartments aren't as big as houses and the Swiss enjoy going away on vacation so they are easier to take care of.
3. Houses are harder to come by, even for the Swiss, and many don't want to move away from their town just to buy a piece of property.
4. Property is hard to come by due to zoning laws.
5. Building Swiss houses used to be more expensive a few years ago but prices have come down due to high tech, imports and lesser quality.
To understand a housing market, you have to always look at what the finance guys are coming up with to enrich themselves, such as our infamous and ridiculous subprime mortgages, which ended in a big ball of fire. Can everyone be sure that Switzerland isn't in a bubble, what with the very low interest rates I keep hearing about? House prices there did decline for about a decade in the 80's (can't remember the exact dates). There is no guarantee that it won't happen again, whenever interest rates increase.