Tom
1. Do they have power of attorney to act on the behalf of the company or entity claiming to be owed money?
1a. Can they provide any evidence of a contract between myself and the company or entity?
2. Are they acting under the statute of limitations of the debt for that jurisdiction?
3. Inform them they can swivel on the OR 106 "costs"
My expectation is that they will not try to file a Betreibung in my case but if they do, it will be rejected very quickly and clearly based on the above points. Right now, I have a nicely-worded invitation to cave to fear and pay for something I have no knowledge of.
And since the bill they're suggesting I owe is foreign, it's unlikely that they can enlighten me into what it's actually for. So I would assume any Betreibung will fail once I reject it.
EDIT: beaten by Urs Max!
As the poker gurus will tell you, leave your emotion at the door.
But in this case he clearly owed the money (even if it was ricardos fault they never sent an invoice) and Intrum is not some little scam company run from a garage.
Rather then risking getting an unpaid debt on your record, i would in this case just pay them and then fix it after. I mean how much are we talking here, ricardos fees are low and interest plus fee on that can't be much - 30 chf?
Tom
Why are you so vigorously refusing to trying to see my point?
Anyways my work here is done, OP good luck with all this!
Connect the dots.
I used an email address with a plus sign in it, followed by a tag (e.g., [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) ). I often do this so that I can tell if a company that asks for my email address ever sells it to spammers. This is a standard, if lesser-known, part of the SMTP protocol specification. My suspicion is that Ricardo’s billing system did (does?) not know how to handle email addresses like this.
They never sent me the bill by postal mail either — not even by normal post, much less registered post.
They sent my a screenshot that appeared to show that they had sent not just the original email, but also a couple of reminders. I received none of these messages.
If they send you a Betreibung and you reject it ("Ich erhebe vollumfänglich Rechtsvorschlag") then they must prove that you owe it. In the case for me, I doubt this evidence (and much other evidence) exists - but for the OP, I would say it opens an interesting case.
1. If Ricardo blocks you from being able to look at your account (and correct your situation) then you are unable to verify a bill
2. If a bill is sent as a PDF attachment via email, you can cast doubt that you received it - but in your case, you can present evidence that you paid a bill to Ricardo
I would simply reject it and if asked, bring the evidence that you paid the (or an) amount to Ricardo and that you have been blocked from your account so you cannot verify whether that is for the full amount.
I wonder if you (or I) will ever see a Betreibung. Mine will either stop this week completely or run for a month or two. I intend to start invoicing them for my time and expenses if it continues.