The thing with babes, for example, is nursing. With regular flu, mine was quite well protected, no idea how that worked, but with Herpes, the reaction was so over the top, even antibodies in my milk didn't make it easier. The crap was she had about 50 extremely painful sores all over her little mouth, inside, the fevers were 40, no willingness to eat since that hurt her so bad. The only thing was to dope her with painkillers and wait it up, praying to not get dehydrated. Horrible 2 wks. Was I cranky with my friend? Not really, although what she did was stupid. Sure, kids can get it anyways, but honestly, if somebody does have a sore, keep away from kissing, smootching, rubbing your eyes and other people's faces. Acyclovir works really well, but only the nicely concentrated one (I didn't give it to my little one, she was too young).
But it is true, I think I would only blame people who were obviously in contageous phase and didn't mind infecting me.
I wouldn't say flu is harder on kids than herpes when they are tiny. Kids die of complications, so it really depends on their immune system, which is a big unknown at that stage. And, while mortality is one thing, long term side effects (caused by encephalytis, eye inf, etc.) are major concerns, too.
But, let's not hijack, I think people with sores just usually know how to behave, it is too bad when the bad combo happens - "recipients" happen to be in a vulnerbale state and "donors" are actually unaware of being infectious.
Some folks may shrug and say "Ah, it's just a cold" or "Ahh, it's the flu, people get that all the time" but for me, it is more. If I catch it in winter, it almost guarantees I'll be coughing until spring. As it happened this passed "cold & flu season", I caught it within a week of having surgery last November and still had lingering coughs right to February.
As I said early in this thread, it is one thing to not know you're at a contagious stage, then the only thing I could do is say "aw, shucks, life sucks"... but to have a sore (or know some other way that you're contagious) and kiss someone anyhow, that's simply uncaring.
JLP hasn't said and even though MN's statistics show that it is possible to never know you've got it until after you're in an intimate situation with someone who is in an infectious stage (so automatically attribute it to them), I would think that the odds of having been infected all along and "only just" becoming symptomatic after coming into contact with someone who has it "too" are likely pretty low. I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that JLP attributes it to a specific encounter as that is the most likely source, not because she's into casting accusations willy-nilly and I (again, perhaps incorrectly) infer from that she knows (somehow) that the person in question was at a contagious stage.
If it were truly just a simple crap-shoot whether you ever catch it or display symptoms or not (as some of ya'll seem inclined to want to make it seem), we would not have the warnings against risky activities that we do. If it were truly THAT mysterious how to avoid either catching or spreading, I'm sure the message would be more along the line of "if you get it, you get it, if you don't, well you probably will sometime anyhow."
It honestly strikes me as extremely odd though how often they continue to show condoms as some safeguard against herpes as I know full well that condoms are hardly a protection from quite a few "sexually transmitted" infections / infestations. I was given a lovely batch of crabs by a live-in bf in my early 20s, believe-you-me I got tested for all sorts of things then. I'm sure though that medical knowledge 20yrs ago was not the same as it is now but still... if you can have it on your thighs, back, buttocks, groin, lower belly (or anywhere else really for that matter), a condom really isn't going to do much so far as herpes is concerned.
Perhaps I imagine this wrong but surely you do not need to see it to know that you have an active sore...?
I've seen pictures of sores inside the mouth, those can be felt, can they not?
So... it is fairly "easy" if someone only has sores someplace not visible, for them to know but still keep their partner in the dark, right?
I never have had Herpex Simplex 1 in my life, yes it is possible not to have ever been infected. I caught it from someone that had sores on his mouth but did not indicate to me he was infectious. Call me stupid, but since I've never been confronted with Herpes nor have been near anyone with it I know little about it. The contact was not from "air kisses".
I know when I have a cold or the flu (the only infectious diseases I have) I alert someone before they get near me "I am sick and can be contagious, it is probably best not to get near me". Sound familiar?
For those who doubt why I have brought this to the attention of the EF it is because I do NOT want anyone to go through what I am. I was at the Dr's last week when I first posted this, again today and have another appt in 2 weeks. I kindly invite any doubters to come with me and see how much fun this is. The pain makes me scream, I am not paid when I miss work and am at the Dr's, I'm paying a fortune in bills but this is nothing to the loss of sight and a future transplant.
Again, I would like to thank those that posted kind wishes; as of today the virus is still active in my eye and there is additional lose of vision.
Lastly... if you're going to the dentist and whether you think you have herpes or not, lather those lips with Virucal or just plain old petroleum jelly. Your dentist may think you're coming on to them (or you've got a jelly fetish) but when they're pushing down on your lips with utensils, mouth dams, etc. it's a perfect opportunity for breakout madness.
Just my 2 Pence.
Please stop being total *EDIT* (yes, I am not pleased with either of your attitudes) and grow up, losing eyesight is not fun and games. God forbid either of you catch a disease from your significant other or anyone else for that matter. I do not understand why, but for some reason, you two seem to take some kind of delight in what has happened to me and that is disgusting.
Economisto please close this thread or EDIT Mathnut to do so. What was meant to be a warning about a contagious disease has now turned into an immature hahaha-athon.
What's your point?
Just because a lot of people have it, it doesn't mean those of us who don't should be indifferent to catching it. And should I ever catch it, I would prefer that it be an accident, not from someone who knows they are contagious.
I invite you to come to my next appt week after next and I will have the Dr explain to you about Herpes Simplex Eye Disease and my case.
I was in the 10% that never had the disease... I think you are having a hard time understanding that. Example: Childhood Diseases- most of us have had them, except Mr P of L-P never had caught one and at 30 did and as an adult male to catch what he did was devastating.
****
Please let's get back to the disease.
Thank you kslausanne for your comments and understanding (and again everyone else).
As the Romans might have said: caveat osculor.
All you can say is that you never exhibited any symptoms.
There are several posts on this thread which explain that in great detail. Before you start getting annoyed with those who are seeing this objectively, perhaps you ought to read them?
The use of condoms certainly does help greatly in the prevention of HSV or HPV.
I personally don't think condoms should be used for the prevention of STDs. If you are worried about contracting STDs from said person then you probably shouldn't be sleeping with them in the first place....call me old fashioned
It may have been very small, more like a zit or small red bump. Maybe it was dark, or she had taken off her glasses. It's insulting to suggest that the OP does not have the awareness to avoid something so openly disgusting. The point is that the person violated the rules of common decency, not to mention her trust.
Anyway, it caused serious damage to her eye, and that's terrible. So we should all be more mindful of what we might pass along to others, and give them the choice to take the risk or not, regardless of how many people carry the infection. It's common sense.