1 month 12.9%
1 year 33.7%
3 years 74.4%
5 years 153.6%
FTSE 100
1 year minus 1.15%
3 / 5 / 10 year appalling as well.
Buy a tracker if it makes you feel better.
I think difference in inflation should show in the exchange rate. However, the latter are much more influenced by lots of noise, in particular GDP growth relative to other countries and central bank monetary policy, so the effect of the inflation difference often doesn't show unless you use very long term figures, and use economically similar start and end points as that's when much of the noise should have similar effects on both points.
Certainly. A similar move as the one in the '90ies from 1.15 to 1.75 in 2000/01 happened in recent years when the USD went from 0.70 to 0.95. But if you agree that a downward trend is characterized by "lower lows and lower highs" (which implies that there will be counter-moves, you don't get highs otherwise) then the big trend is clear.
Impressive performance by Fundsmith. But then again, perhaps not so much as RHS (an SP500 equal weight consumer staples fund, Fundsmith holds 2/3 in US stocks, about 3/4 thereof in staples and IT, NASDAQ 100 showed similar performance) gained 130% over the last five years.
PS:
Thanks for the greenies FMF
It's not fair to put FTSE 100 as a respresentative for a broad index. The point is to own as much of the market as possible.
Exactly that! So even Fundsmith can be underperfoming an index it so strongly depends on. And is that a sustainable growth? Can consumer staples outperform the market for decades?
Warren Buffet in his annual letter to shareholders for 1995 (BRKA stock had gained 45% in that year, clearly beating the SP500's 34%):
"There's no reason to do handsprings over 1995's gains. This was a year in which any fool could make a bundle in the stock market. And we did. To paraphrase President Kennedy, a rising tide lifts all yachts."
On a more speculative note: Do you think the World will recover, or is it a longer trend?
If you look at salaries & cost of living v neighbouring countries, it would indicate the CHF is over valued, with free movement of people mean reversion should occur if the chart is long enough.
Are you sure? Currency value is an effect of monetary policy. If you print money the value will decrease. If not, why would it? Maybe the long term perspective is that the salaries will stagnate and prices will go down, while the currency keeps getting stronger?
Salaries will continue to fall in CH, it's very easy to sack someone & then rehire the same person or someone else at a reduced salary. 15 years ago 15-18k a month was very standard offer if you wanted someone to move to CH, today people will up root for 10-12k a month, thats well above median Swiss salaries.
I retired at 52 as investment gains exceed post tax earnings from working as salaries fell.
Asset prices will remain high as interest rates remain low.
I'm more concerned about the impact of boomers retiring and liquidating their assets which may be the underlying driver of a future secular bear market in assets.
That's why diversify.
If you believe you can never beat the indexes, you won't have a successful investing career
So what would be your diversification strategy at that Point and now? Bonds?
So you believe you can beat the market? And what makes you think so? Maybe you have a deep knowledge of the markets, spending countless hours on analyses. But I don't have time for that.
Then is the question what comes next. I can imagine a following scenario:
Globalisation and Automation reduce demand for Labor Salaries drop, corporate income grows rich get richer, poor get poorer Demand for products falls due to lower salaries Prices drop salaries and Prices dropped? Deflation Again, look one step further. The Baby boomers will convert from Investors to consumers, so we will have an increasing Group of people who don't work, but spend money. How is that bad for Business?
And if the developed societies get older, then not only the Labor demand will drop, but also the supply.
What are you talking about? Can you provide some data to Support this? Below you can see that the average salary went up in the last 20 years.
any proof to back this statement
These are in nominal terms, not inflation adjusted, and average, not split into quantiles.
18 years ago IT rates were CHF 1200 a day for anyone with a beating heart, more than twice what that same person will earn today.
Plenty of people here are on salaries 50% plus higher than the offer they would get today, I don't think you have been in CH very long.
to be fair that comparison applies to anywhere in the world... I was contracting with those rates 10-15 years ago but based in southern europe, its not fair to say that is the average wage in southern europe 15 years ago which is how I read your earlier message