A good lay article discussing this study, from the NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/28/s...ior-genes.html
Quoting from the article:
After conducting owner surveys for 18,385 dogs and sequencing the genomes of 2,155 dogs, a group of researchers reported a variety of findings in the journal Science on Thursday, including that for predicting some dog behaviors, breed is essentially useless, and for most, not very good.
(The NYT article may be behind a paywall - many other news outlets have picked up the study, a quick google will give you other articles.)
The study was also discussed on a recent Science Friday podcast:
https://www.sciencefriday.com/segmen...reed-behavior/
The interview is with Elinor Karlsson of the University of Massachusetts - well worth listening to.
Abstract of the study, from the journal Science:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...651.1609118629
We surveyed owners of 18,385 dogs (49% purebred) and sequenced the DNA of 2155 dogs. Most behavioral traits are heritable [heritability (h2) > 25%], but behavior only subtly differentiates breeds. Breed offers little predictive value for individuals, explaining just 9% of variation in behavior. For more heritable, more breed-differentiated traits, like biddability (responsiveness to direction and commands), knowing breed ancestry can make behavioral predictions somewhat more accurate (see the figure). For less heritable, less breed-differentiated traits, like agonistic threshold (how easily a dog is provoked by frightening or uncomfortable stimuli), breed is almost uninformative.
FYI, the owner surveys were gathered by the 'citizen's science' Darwin's Ark project:
---
I'll be following further research into this topic with great interest.
(Here's looking at you, BSL... )