I think the OP's question, I think it's been answered already, but in essence the Swiss and general European approach is that no-one can prohibit you from skiing anywhere if you want to, and conversely that wherever you do ski you're doing so at your own risk. No such thing as a safety guarantee, not here or anywhere.
It's not likely to get lost, he's not likely to get lost, she's not likely to get lost, the dog is not likely to get lost.
your absolutely right, my grammer sucks
'it is not easy to get lost' is I guess, what I wanted to say.
Either way, going to tempt fate and hit some power on Saturday!
I guess (that) I will never be able to pretend that I am Canadian. My punctuation will let me down. Either way hit some powder (hopefully not in small packets)
...and you missed the grammar misspelling.
I guess I should have posted the /s x 2 indicator
Also a lot of the smaller resorts are reached by a cablecar from low level - look at somewhere like Ebenalp, it's basically surrounded by cliffs on three sides.
I've skied every piste in Flumserberg at least 20 times, but a couple of weekends ago I still had to go from pole to pole on a simple red where the snow had blown over in a whiteout! Losing it wouldn't have been a disaster, but it would have been a very unpleasant slog through rough ground in ski boots - in a whiteout you often can't even tell which way is down or if you're moving, let alone what is in front of you.
I honestly don't know what would have happened had we not heard him. The fog didn't clear at all and no-one would have had a clue where to start looking.
Austrian avalanche: Czech skiers killed in Alps
https://www.editionspaulsen.com/aval...du-risque.html
Their point is that the avalanche risk scale is only the start of making an intelligent assessment of when off piste is "safe". The two main factors to consider are the orientation (North facing doubles the risk) and angle of slope (40° is twice as dangerous as 35° that is twice as dangerous as 30°).
The good news is that the Swiss have vastly improved over the last 10 years, thanks to careful training of guides and instructors. The French remain true to type - a bunch of reckless headbangers - ten French guides die every year...
Italian Alps avalanche kills six near Monte Nevoso
Sources:
They use a mix of oxygen and propane i think, are triggered by simple button press remotely, ie in the night when operators decide that it's better to use them. They pop an explosion strong enough to trigger any potential slide around. Examples can be seen are in Chamonix and La Clusaz (my preferred spots, not only for off-piste).
Now is this 100%? Of course, nothing is. 100% safety means staying home. Last year some people died on the pistes too. Taking a guide gives you best localized evaluation, but it's only so far it will go, plus there is no element of independence, you are taken by hand like a child by professional. Czech people killed last month had quite a few certified expert guides (and yes they have same training and certs as Swiss ones, nothing less) and look what happened. Also if you look at stats at slf.ch, there are quite a few deaths in last 15 years with avalanche level 1!
Stats are not that bad for this winter, but generally it's bad conditions there. Crappy start of the winter contributed, layers are not so bound as they should be.
I've personally seen rescue efforts of one guy in avalanche a month ago near La Clusaz - in the morning level was 2, when I came back that day it was 4 (when I came when they were already packing - altogether cca 100 people involved, including 2 dogs and 3 choppers, guy sadly died in hospital next day Last week friend's friend got caught in a massive one near Bonneville while touring, he is in coma now after full cardiac arrest (basically he died and was revived) and might never get back.
If in any doubts, I rather skip the adrenaline part this winter, and advise other to do the same (on the other hand, Vallee Blanche last weekend was pure awesomeness, but that is more about crevasses than avalanches, see the other photo)