I had what I think is a fairly common wish to have a childbirth without pain relief. My plan was due to two things.
1. All the data linking epidurals and other meds to an increased risk of interventions.
2. The social side of things. Women seem to wear this badge of honor for going through childbirth without pain relief. I felt guilty to try anything else.
Yes, childbirth isn't a sickness. But why are women so adamant to refuse pain relief for childbirth but perfectly okay taking meds for everything else under the sun? Is the risk to the baby *that* great to warrant it? I think just loving your unborn child and going through pregnancy is enough of a badge of honor. And as you'll see in my case, I'd likely have required interventions had I not received pain relief.
Anyways...
I had a birth plan with "no this, that and the other." Pretty much "no" to most everything. I'd initially wanted a home birth too. Yet nothing had prepared me for the pain of a posterior baby. I was in labor for a week and only made it to 2-3 cm despite my contractions on paper being through the roof. They'd come fast and strong for half a day and then suddenly ease off, as the baby wasn't putting the right, consistent pressure he should have been had he been anterior.
The hospital respected my birth plan and instead, offered me a warm bath. It didn't do a thing to help. Around that time, back labor kicked in and I couldn't walk at that point from the contractions and spasms down my back and legs. Oh, and then nausea/sick too. Had I refused the anti-nausea IV meds at that point, I'm sure vomiting for the next 12 hours or so until I delivered would have been more dangerous to me and the baby. As for the epidural, my husband ordered it for me. He said something about me looking possessed and to get me one asap.
Now to reference some debate in this thread about screaming and going the natural route. Don't assume that an epidural = no pain for every woman who receives it. The woman screaming in the room beside you may still have received pain relief. It may not have worked at all or it may not have relieved all her pain. I had a woman like this near me and it scared the crap out of me to listen to that during my labor. I felt awful for her suffering. But hearing her wee one screaming afterwards made me smile. It was such a relief to hear her baby was okay and to hear she finally had her reward!
After I received an epidural, I could still move my legs quite well and roll over. They had to use oxytocin as can happen when the epidural slows down the contractions. But I could still feel my little one kicking and when the time for delivery came, I felt the contractions and pushed him out with only a few pushes. He came out with a nuchal hand and I avoided tearing issues too. Zero interventions. As for noise, well think about tennis players and their grunting. ;p If you're pushing the hardest you've ever pushed, there's a reasonable chance that you'll make some noise whether there is pain or not. And there was still agonizing pain when he came out. I felt the stretching, burning..etc.
I do understand the poster who wonders why women refuse pain relief. Like I said in my two points above, I think those are two key reasons. In retrospect, I think my outcome would have been one with major interventions if I hadn't taken pain relief. I was told I had a contraction pattern consistent with transition when I was only dilating 2-3 cms plus had the nausea/sick. Had I spent the next 12 hours or so until I delivered vomiting and continuing like that, I'd have been without food for a long time plus totally exhausted from the pain and not ready for the pushing phase like I was.
By the way, I think the term "natural childbirth" should be wiped out. It's just another way to make women feel like there's something wrong (i.e. unnatural) about giving birth any other way than vaginally without pain relief. It puts unnecessary pressure on women and harms a beautiful process of bringing life into this world (i.e. having a baby...vaginally or c-section, pain relief or not.). Sandgrounder is right. Her birth is a natural one. You can't correct her and then go on to say definitions don't matter. They do matter by their very existence and application to childbirth.