See-through leggings- classy?

I do love how judgmental EF is about the clothes and appearance of others Cause we're just perfect right

There are clothes and appearances and there are clothes and appearances

There is caring and not caring....and then there is...well just the same again but in italics...you get the picture.

Let people wear whatever they want. Pretty soon this thread will turn everyone into amateur paprazzi who go around taking picture of see through leggings on the tram into work.

That's laying with fire it might go blblblblblb;b;b;b;bb; back!

It would be interesting to see a butt dance in the see-through tights, where the cheeks clench and unclench in rhythmic time, perhaps you could try it with the chicken dance to impress KFC? Might get you a freebie!

Of course people can wear what they like. It does not mean we have to like it.

It also doesn't mean you have to make threads on internet forums berating them for their choice.

I sure hope we don't find Kim Kardashian dead in her hotel room in a few months time...You will have a lot of questions to answer for Nicolaschulz

Oh no, not another death that I will be held responsible for

And so what? I don't see this thread being worst than an other one in the complain corner being trash by other members having a go at the op.

But I find pretty funny to see some on this thread bashing on Kim kardashian's butt and praise curvy women in the other thread....

When did I create a league table of bad threads and put this one at the top?

Are you DB in disguise?

You see, Mr. KFC (haha I'm a poet ) here's the thing, these people wear these clothes because of the following equation:

The more tongues that wag and so-called judgments that are made = $€£

Kim Kardashan has done a lot to raise the status of big butts, but like you said Nil she doesn't do it with class. I still associate footless tights (see -through or not) with the 80's kind of the Bettte Midler or slightly punk look. I think that only women who can maybe get away with them are women with shapely but incredibly long slim legs and a very shapely tight little butt. Am I thinking Nureyev?

If you want to judge the purpose of a thread, it's pc, etc. Do it equally with other threads as well. It isn't a competition of the worst thread, but if you don't like one, don't join it! I am not a fan of thread who turn into bashing the op so I don't participate since I find it nasty.

Same as judging people for judging other people. Everybody judge someone else about something or an other. Is it ok? Nope. But we are not competing to become next mother Theresa.

Don't tell me you never judge someone else's choices, ideas, lifestyle, opinions, etc.

Who wags the tongues though

If this thread is trying to discourage the tongue wagging...it's doing a pretty piss poor job

seriously? A bit harsh me thinks.

I agree this is up there as perhaps one of the less sophisticated threads, perhaps better logged in the "what not to wear" thread.

As for bad threads, there's quite a few I'd put up higher!

as for the leggings? I definitely would not consider them classy! Sexy, yeah definitely. When you objectively look at them, they serve the sole purpose of 'portraying the illusion of nudity' and in all reality, if they were skin coloured, there wouldn't be much difference.

I don't judge someone else's choices, ideas, lifestyle, opinions etc.

I never put this as one of the worst thread. That's what I'm saying...I didn't...I'd go as far as to say I've made worse threads than this!

This has some nice Kardashian bubble bum in it. I give it 3 stars

We wag our own tongues and no, this thread is certainly not trying to discourage tongue wagging. Any case, I'm sure somewhere down the line we are helping contribute to Miss Kardashian's upcoming nuptials.

(she hasn't gotten married yet.. Right? )

That'sit I'm getting my husband a pair- they definitely look better on men, see-through if I can find them

So you are probably the next Jesus Christ.