If you agree to disagree, then don't groan people who disagree with you. In fact, I did not groan the person who called the sensible parents neurotic, helicopter, yady ya.
I completely understand the logic behind trying to foster kid's independence, I think you did not understand the fact I see no use for it at a very early age. Or the fact, that theory is not aplicable at all instances, for all kids and parents, for all places people live, etc. It is yet again so black and white, as if just merely the fact somebody has thought of the concept of kid's independence was enough. It is nice there is an idea of it (and trust me, there are aproppriate ways to foster kid's independence), but to stick to it at all times under any conditions is not sensible to me. Of one leaves a small child unattended in a hot car, that has nothing to do with trying to teach it independence, it endangers the child's life and instances like these should not be shrugged off..
Of course the Swiss moms love their kids. Who said something otherwise? I see the difference in abandonement and a perceived lack of state institutions who should follow up. Call that whatever you want, if you have a two month old, you have a child. If you have a child, you don't walk away from it. I was making a point over babies, infants, carelessness, etc. You jump in making comments about 5yrs old, walking to kindy alone, being a brave Tarzan at an early age, how you would raise your kids. Nobody has tried to talk you out of it, why would one, it is completely your own biz. I, and some others, have made a few points about how we feel un/comfortable to leave kids alone and what age. Besides I know you don't even have kids on your own. I am not talking about different attitude to leaving kids alone when they are capable of taking care of themselves. I am talking about small kids, 2mo-whenever, that are not able to deal with some situations and are still left to fend for themselves (I said "whenever" on purpose, since I know kids that aren't capable of doing so even way past the normal age and nobody should push them, they have their own pace, all kids should).
All the local moms I know here would never ever dream of leaving their little kid alone, for a minute. Not even at three, not even at 4. 5 maybe, with other siblings in charge, I still see a lot of moms walking their little ones at 5 to kindy from my window every day, and I completely agree with them. Since, theories on independence aside, we do not live in a particularly safe part of town traffic-wise and they are sensible parents.
I am all for a responsible parenting, I don't need the state to talk into the way my child is being brought up, but on the other hand - to tell a mom to not walk/drive a kid to school? To tell parents to stay away from school premises, etc? That's pretty much an institution involvement to me. We got so much unsolicited advice on parenting from our tactless and undprofessional ped, it is unbelievable. And it was a load of bull, too. To push people insensibly to endanger their kid while the parents disagree, that's a state involvement.
I actually come from a place, where the state involvement means definitely positive outcome, since children are a priority back home, I have to say, there aren't enough of them. They pay us 4years maternity leave, a delivery rent, free healthcare for both the kiddo (until 18) and the mom, subsidized diapers and formula, all baby products (and there is a huge healthy choice of them, too, have you ever checked out the choice here???), free lactation advice up to 3yr of the child, highest quality day care (way higher than here, with a very detailed educational and psy program) for cca 30fr a month. Have you checked how much the day care is here? And how does the price (I think it was 2800 fr a month last time we checked) corresponds with the quality? Don't the babies matter? And how can the moms work when they have to run back and forth for lunch breaks, etc? Kids, moms and elderly do not get a preferential treatment in this society, let's put it this way.
There is a legislature in terms of who is responsible for your child back home, when you are a child care taker, you do not leave your child unatended. If you do, you face charges. The kids there, and I have taught there since 1995, are actually super independent. Nobody picks them up and drives them around, but nobody forces parents into anything, yet the responsibility and sensibility is big. If it ain't you catch a flak, from everyone. The legal responsibility is divided between parents, child care or school. If something happens within the time child is taken care of by somebody, the guardian is taken to be questioned, for the reason of safety, as a reminder that you have to protect the little ones, etc...So, if you show up repeatedly at your ped with a kiddo who is improperly dressed and has a pneumonia couple times of year, you get rightly questioned. And we do not have any darn ZEWI blankets. We do not leave infants alone in the house.
So, the question is still here and that is the reason, actually, why I was thinking out loud about the incident and other instances I saw people endangering their little ones. What is legal and what is not? Is there even a proper legislature in terms of responsibility for the kids (leaving them alone, in potentially dangerous situations), at what age, etc.?
I am glad you are Swiss, you will know the correct answer since you know already how you will raise your kids.