He's already got his new toy (Nissan Qashqai 1.6 diesel, so i'm reliably informed, best 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th car in the world)
Fribourg canton not happy, lots of job losses.
Reason it is a company of its own can actually be found in the law. From the press releases linked in OP:
"According to the provisions of the Radio and Television Act (RTVA), the collection agency may not engage in any economic activities other than the collection of the household fee"
Oooops, then part of my post 13 was unfair to Swisscom. I appologize
It's the green one ...... eeeehhhhm, I ofcourse mean, make your choice.
Similarly radio - except for some cheap "let's invite a politician" talks. I'm pretty sure if they vacated the space the private stations would fill it with same cr@p.
These 1.3 billion CHF could be saved for a better cause.
I have a "personal" gripe with the public media here: I never remember a thing like this to see in either RTS or SRF: a journalist with a mic on the street, asking random people about their opinion, and every n-th person barely speaking/not speaking the lingo. It doesn't happen.
I think the worst thing is that they're a lapdog of the establishment, and this limits the space and means for civic grass roots critic of it.
edit: some of this money goes also to private media, so they'll probably not support "kill Bill".
However they didn't want to scrap the fees, as they believe the Swiss national TV stations are important in keeping the country together: by reporting about those folks with the funny accents, across the Rösti ditch.
The TV & Radio fees are also used to finance local radio, which would probably disappear without funding (Remember WRS an English language station in Geneva?)
If not, what the hell am I going to be forced to pay for now? Subsidizing SRF's advertising income?
This law is complete bullshit. You could go on all day about 'it's what the people decided democratically' - true, but what a reflection of the people's mentality.
The financial problems here are made worse because Switzerland has to supply programmes in 3 languages, and has a very small population. New York, London and Paris all have larger populations than Switzerland, but they only have to supply single language programmes. Advertising rates are cheaper there too, as the target population is very much larger.
Maybe only that they try to limit the influence of foreign broadcasters?
So now we pay for these peoples' homeopathic treatment, and then we pay for a conventional treatment when the first doesn't work. We pay twice.
And people voted for this....
None that I know of. Do you know of that happening here in Switzerland? How is that relevant?
Personally I don't watch TV. I don't own one. No radio, either. I specifically removed the radio from my vehicle so that I wouldn't have to pay the stupid Billag fee for services that I neither want, use, or agree with. And my German's just fine, thanks - nothing to do with being a foreigner.
The private stations programs are ALL distributed by SRG.
No SRG, no radio/TV broadcasts by anybody.
(P.S. I personally designed the new system of radio program distribution in Switzerland, as well as it's previous two iterations, so I know how it works. )
Tom
TV streaming is now 2/3 of traffic in North America. I know, because I wrote/write software for these internet switchboards, and the various cellular radios :-)