Mark
I've been using mono perosnal lasers for years and like brother and samsung. I toyed with a colour one a month or 2 ago and had a look. Toner is cheaper then HP (IIRC), and probably printer as well.
Cheers
P.S. Had some shocking pre-sales service from digitec in the past. I know others have given them favourable reviews, but I won't be going back there...
Mark
Recently at work they replaced our nice HP Laserjet (an expensive one) with a Dell (cheap one). If speed is not a consideration the Dell is OK. Unfortunately I don't like Dell (I put them in the same basket as M$).
And yes, I would dump the xerox and buy new again - cheapo laser < new toner. Go figure.
And I went laser because I dried two heads up on inkjets and you guessed it - borderline more economical to buy a new one. Here's to the environment
You are right it is kind of perverse when it is cheaper to replace the printer than buy new parts. So you just turn up to media markt, dump it in their big bin, walk inside and buy another one.... Of course I'm not advocating that this should be done - the environmental impact of producing all those parts to just land up in the bin is unthinkable, but the economic argument for it is persuasive!
When I looked at the 2550 to buy a set of 4 toner cartridges and a drum (at 5,000 pages - this model lasts longer) the cost would be around 600. Now this printer can be bought at various sites on toppreise for just under 400.. So for 5,000 pages that's a cost of under 0.12 per page - not bad at all... Mind you - how long would it take me to actually print 5,000 pages? I only plan on using it for proofs of ads etc before they go to print - it would probably last me a good 5 years, and by then it will be time to throw it away anyway!
The newer 2600 model has a twist - toner only lasts for 2,000 pages, making the cost per print 0.25 per page - this means HP effectively doubled the price without anyone noticing!
According to several review sites these printers from HP actually come with full cartridges, rather than partially full ones!
But the downside is that despite being cheap to run one reviewer said that the colour reproduction isn't accurate enough to be used for proofs.. Great. that's what I wanted them for
despite what a lot of people say about them, here I would be really tempted to buy Dell. The drum on the new colour lasts 42K sheets and the toners are actually not that expensive. Okay it does cost CHF 600 but so what if the running costs are lower... Also Lexmark is quite reasonable. btw I negotiated a 7% discount on anything Dell - who said you can't negotiate in CH
A comment regarding the Dell - quite often that figure of 42,000 should be divided by 4 - since it is a 4 colour process. If you print black and white it is a single colour process.
Mark
Maybe by the time comes to refill it there will be cheaper 3rd party solutions on the market - but let's face it - there will probably be a much nicer and cheaper model that I can buy when that time comes anyway!
Mark