Thank you for your help.
Alloosh
Thank you for your help.
Alloosh
Many thanks
Aloosh
The issue of custody should not be confused with the parental authority.
Personally I would encourage you to allow the child as much access to tha father as is possible rather than it becoming a source of tension for the child. You dont want the child to grow up thinking that it is the reason for conflict between the parents.
Its quite possible to have custody of the child and share parental rights, as far asI know it means the father has a decision in its education and wellfare which is why the father can equally oppose a move to somewhere that the child may not enjoy the same rights of security and education etc as those it gets today.
Equally any opposition to a move that would be beneficial for the child would be difficult to be justified if it were on purely emotional grounds and Im sure a judge would allow that move to take place because afterall the childs welfare is paramount and that is how the law sees it.
So I wouldnt be intimidated about the joint parental authority deal, as it can only help to keep the good relationship between father and child, and the legal system (tuteur or child protection agency) will always help in problems.
Ask at the Frauenhaus to recommend a good lawyer! The police will give you the address and telephone number.
Where things can get interesting is the " l'autorité parentale ". I understand that the courts are going with this option as the starting point and it would be up to the mother to prove that the father should not have half of the parental authority. This means that ALL decisions about the health, schooling and well-being of the child(ren) must be agreed upon with your ex. first. It is up to the mother (who has la garde) to keep the father updated about any and all events in the life of the child(ren). And making sure that he has his say before any decisions are taken
Kindly be advised that a "tuteur" in the canton de Vaud can be an ordinary Swiss citizen (of good repute) who is selected by the canton to act as a "tuteur" (all decisions) or "curateur" (financial decisions) regarding a person (adult or child) who is not capable of making decisions for himself/herself.
Basically you've suggested to the OP to hand over parental decisions for an undetermined amount of time to another person.
Now even if that person, selected as a "tuteur" is a saint, even with the best of interests, he/she is still an outsider.
Unless there is a viable reason to have a "tuteur" step in, the parents should certainly be able to come to terms in the interest of their child.
It means that we have to agree on the MAJOR decisions concerning our son: health, education and religion. Your choice of babysitter for instance does not really concern him.
Since you have custody, you can go live wherever you want, your ex has nothing to say about it.
Note that you can share authority only if both of you agree to do so. If you refuse, you keep it for yourself. But it's generally important for the fathers to share it, as it helps them feel that they are still a parent and an important part of their child's life, even though they don't have custody.
Thank you for your help
Alloosh
But I'd advise you to do like me, and plan the visitations and costs already in your divorce agreement in case you go back to the UK. How often will your child see his father? Who will pay for the travels costs? etc.
In our case, we went to see a mediator to settle everything (alimony, custody, visitations, etc.). When we reached an agreement, we shared the same lawyer to go to court. A mediator is much cheaper than a lawyer, and they really try to help you
Sorry so many requests but much appreciated.
Alloosh
If I go abroad, he'll have him for most of the summer holidays + Xmas. We'll share the plane costs. And we'll use Skype on a very regular basis so they can communicate.
I very highly recommand our mediator, Marie-France Courvoisier, Rte des Flumeaux 1, 1008 Prilly (021/646.59.82). She was truly excellent at helping us communicate and keeping our son's interest at the centre, even though my ex and I were barely in speaking terms at the time. But she speaks only French, as far as I know.
I found the comments above very different from my experience.
I think there is a misconception that mothers will automatically be granted sole custody in Switzerland. I certainly believed this initially.
The judge in my case was very clearly in favor of joint custody (even though my daughter lives with me), unless there was a strong reason for the father not to be given custody (think violence, etc, which was not the case).
We spent a long time in court discussing what this specifically means with regards to decision making, and in my case it meant:
- I take all the day to day decisions re doctors, school etc, but should consult my ex with regards to major decisions
- I expressly cannot take our child to another country without his consent, as this would interfere with his relationship with his daughter
I understand this position, even though it goes against what I emotionally feel is right, as I am very much the main carer.
I imagine a key factor will be how hard your partner fights for his visitation rights, and if he would be at all open to you taking your child to live in the UK or elsewhere.
I wish you all the best in this!
For example - Is a British mother allowed to take a Swiss child abroad, against the will of the Swiss father? If the child is also British? If the child is 'only' Swiss?
Thanks dottie for your reply, but I am not sure if you mean joint custody or joint parental authority. Since the child is living with you, it sounds like you are talking about joint parental authority. Also, was the judge in Swtzerland or Germany?
As parents we share joint custody (gemeinsame Sorgerecht, we are in the German speaking part), but as out above, I have the right to take all the day to day decisions.
We spent a lot of time defining exactly what these decisions are.
I did apply for single custody (having been told that I could quite easily get this in Switzerland), but the judge was clearly against it.
I understand that single custody (normally the mother) was common in the past, but there is pressure in CH legal circles to change the legislation towards the European model of joint custody.
My lawyer told me that the individual judge's preferences play a strong role in this. Some judges are happy to award single custody, others not. Mine was not.
However, to end on a positive note: if I did want to take my daughter back to the UK (she holds a British passport) the judge did say that it would take exceptional circumstances for my ex to block this.
I think the best thing is to get good legal advice (and it will be expensive, think CHF 1000-2000) ... this was just my experience and one thing I have learnt about Switzerland is that there are many grey areas in the topics of custody and child maintenance. The guidelines are not as strict as one would expect.
Just an awful situation for you ... and your child