Driving Licence at 75 years old

When you reach 75 (it was 70 until a few years ago) you are obliged to prove you are still safe to drive and keep your licence. This works as follows:

The street traffic office send a letter a few weeks around your 75th birthday. The letter explains that you have a couple of months to respond, either by handing in your licence in the envelope provided with the letter (not stamp affixed) or get your doctor to test you.

The letter contains a code number, which your doctor can send electronically to the street traffic office after the consultation.

Eye test is very rudimentary. Just indicating whether a squared “W” is facing up, down left or right. With glasses and without, covering one eye each time. I wear glasses - multifocal for reading and distance and passed without glasses. Otherwise a ‘must wear glasses to drive’ code is added to your licence. A new licence would be issued and charged for.

The rest incudes touching you nose with your eyes closed. Checking peripheral vision. Following the doctor’s finger with your head still. Walking a couple of metres in a straight line without falling over. Finally the doctor checks to see if you heart is still beating.

I was surprised there was no reaction test al all.

Within 48 hours I received a letter from the street traffic office saying I was good for another 2 years - and a bill for CHF100.- from my doctor, which the health insurance won’t help with…

4 Likes

Mom had the same… she hasn’t driven in >10 years…

That said, she keeps her license active “just in case” (it also makes her feel older to be told - you cannot drive anymore).

I’ve dug this one up again as my doctor’s practice and the Zurich Strassenverkehrsamt (Street Traffic Office) do not see eye to eye.

Twice my other half who as worn glasses since age 12 has been advised after the rudimentary eye test at our doc’s (CHF120,- if you please) that she must pay CHF20- to have her driving licence updated to show “no glasses required”. She can’t see a thing beyond 2 metres without them.

Now they have written to me, who passed the simple eye test, advising that I must pay and have “glasses or contact lenses” added to my license.

I actually have 20/20 vision after cataract lens replacement surgery and have no glasses at all.

The practice say they filled in the form correctly and the street traffic office agrees to differ…

Sounds like they’ve mixed the 2 of you up.

3 Likes

I’d find another Doctor. I wouldn’t want to trust them with anything more critical than an eye test.

Or go to your optician and get them to confirm what’s needed by whom.

It is all crazy

I have a 92-year-old friend and I would never get into an auto when he was behind the steering wheel

His doctor failed him in the driving competence test

He appealed and got his license back

With age my vision ability changed, glasses suddenly are way off, but I stopped wearing them at some point (wasn’t driving at that time). I don’t drive regularly so I just use 0 glasses behind the wheel

my in-laws kept on driving up to their 90s,…Some five years back, I had already refused to get into their car if I wouldn’t drive it.

the children asked their house doctor to revoke their license,… well, it was not possible. The DOCTOR said … “they passed the ‘test’, and they only go shopping with the car, and to church – just a couple of kilometers within the village, you cannot remove their freedom”. SO IRRESPONSIBLE.

After they suffered major health problems (a stroke, and some other cardiac serious events), a full test was required by the doctor. And then, on the ’ control’ part of the test (a computer driving simulation with cars around them), which measures attention, reaction time and coordination, both of them crashed their computer cars within seconds.
It was a real relief!

2 Likes

The optician has no part to play in these tests, it’s all done by one of the approved doctors.

My husband had a similar thing to the OP.
His doc filled out the forms and stated that he needed glasses for driving based on his eye test.
Because his vision was technically better than the minimum requirement for the drivers licence he got a letter from them requesting he upload a new photo without his glasses and stating that they would remove the requirement to wear glasses from his licence. He received a new licence in the post a few days later but wasn’t charged for it.

The scary thing is he can’t really see clearly without his glasses and can barely read road signs unless they are really near so he’d be dangerous if he drove without them. The system here seems totally bonkers to me.

3 Likes

My grandmother came over one day, all jubilant because she finally got a handicapped parking permit.

The handicap that qualified her for the parking permit? Loss of vision.

Yikes.

She drove for another decade…

3 Likes

It’s about 20/40 min vision for no correction, 0.5 of normal vision, if you only have 1 eye you need 0.6!

back in the days when I was exchanging my license for a Swiss one, the optometrist told me that in EU the rules are more lenient than in Switzerland that’s why I suddenly got a “require glasses” code on the plastic. I think it was something like 0.5 approved in EU, but only 0.3 approved in Switzerland (whatever these numbers means, funny just asking AI it turns out the Swiss rules are more lenient, as I have had one eye always perfect). I don’t know, maybe I should indeed remove the silly code from my license.

0.3 is worse than 0.5, with 1.00 being 20:20 / 6/6 ‘normal’ vision