asking as it seems that it hasn't been asked. Is it customary that a potential employee take a drug test during the hiring process? I'm asking as in the US it is generally accepted that many, if not all, test new hires.
Thanks.
asking as it seems that it hasn't been asked. Is it customary that a potential employee take a drug test during the hiring process? I'm asking as in the US it is generally accepted that many, if not all, test new hires.
Thanks.
In the US it is definitely required for a high percentage of general workers through management regardless of their jobs and for an even higher percentage of workers that work with machinery and other types of equipment. I for example have taken the test with my past three employers.
I think that the companies do it as it may be required for their insurances and employee benefits, but they also promote it to the local community stating that they are a "drug free workplace".
I believe that if the company does business with the US gov then they also need to do the screening due to the "Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988".
OK, If I really had to I'd probably test some cannabis, weed, but definitely decline anything heavier like heroin or crack cocain. You never know where that may lead you.
How dare they question me like this.
Have had it written into my terms of condition for employment in UK and possible they do the same in Switzerland for certains industries
I think it is kind of like asking for the credit record here- as mentioned a few posts up, it becomes an integrity issue. I would have no problem taking a drug test.
Weird that it would be a Swiss company. If they tested for pot though, half the country would have it in their bloodstream due to their neighbors toking it up. I'm dreading the balcony this summer, I have the feeling my neighbors are Cheech and Chong.
(That said, but it is another story for another thread, unemployed people have more credit problems because they have NO MONEY so I also don't think it is fair to ask for a Betreibungsauszug unless the person is handling money)
Or rather, I would, then after I passed I'd tell them to f... off!
(but I would waste as much of their time as possible)
Tom
that said, I do not believe we test new hires here in Europe. not because we don't want to, but most European countries (Switzerland included though not to the same extent as Germany or the Netherlands) are very employee-friendly and the data privacy issues on this side of the pond are quite tricky.
(Chipped diamond grinding wheel against bare skin is ugly ugly ugly)
Who wants to work with someone who "cherry picks" what laws and policies to follow?
S'ok, it's rhetorical - I know my ideals about my work environment reveal my very military upbringing.
This is not because I take drugs, it is because the insinuation that I do is insulting, and I wouldn't want to support a company that engages in such an invasion of privacy - nobody is getting my bodily fluids unless it is for medical reasons or I'm dating you.
I think that what people do off the clock as long as they don't hurt anyone is their own business, and I definitely think the war on drugs in the U.S. is worse than the drugs themselves. I think that "drug free workplace testing" is an extension of the war on drugs which is another reason I don't support it. I value privacy over any so-called "integrity", and if co-workers use drugs on their off time and still are able to do a great job on the clock I think there is no problem.
William S. Burroughs managed to use heroin and other opioids his entire life. Sigmund Freud was a daily habitual cocaine user in the days where it was still legal with no ill effects. Those and countless others managed to be successful and still have a "drug habit." I think it is WAY past time that the world just legalize, regulate, and tax drugs already and get rid of the stupid and childish social stigmas as well -- we'll all be better off for it.