Greenland

Japan, Korea, Philippines and even Taiwan are strategically too important to give up. It would be a no no by the GOP. But then again??

Probably because he doesn’t know that the US had that many bases there before. He’s not the smartest thing on the block.

And yes, he can probably get everything he wants via negotiation, but instead just keeps demanding they hand over the country. Talk about idiot.

Tough businessman tactics. Always bluffing. Do not forget. He is an X Con!

No negotiation needed

1 Like

But that’s not going to get him access to the rare minerals he wants.

Jim Baird did vote in the House today, wearing a neck brace

Perhaps President Trump thinks the Russian subs are already poised off the Greenland coast ready to sail down the US coast, in order to lay off their largest city & listen to their rock & roll. :thinking: :detective: :rofl:

This article might explain Trump’s obsession with Greenland i.e. another crooked pay day for him and his family at the expense of the USA’s reputation and standing.

1 Like

Actually come to think of it, Putin could cause huge embarrassment to Denmark, Greenland, NATO & Europe by pulling off another “russian sub hunt” stunt around the sea off Greenland, just like one of those “classic” mystery submarine hunts in Swedish Waters in the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s and again as recently as 12 years ago.

Did you ever watch: “Whiskey on the rocks?”

2 Likes

Actually owning resources is not a bad thing IMHO. The argument itself is solid.
You see that with China and Russia.

Of course, if you have the know-how for exploitation and processing so you can sell the refined products that’s even better.

This is basically what China does in Africa, though more on the “soft power” side (“persuading” governments to let China exploit their resources in exchange for some modern infrastructure and some jobs - China even lends them the money to build all the infrastructure…).

It’s a crazy plan, though. But who says it can’t be pulled off?
You can only fail if you try :wink:

I remember, back in the day when the Ukraine thing started and people explained how Russia felt threatened by NATO East-expansion, one of the arguments was basically "I’d rather live under a pax americana than under Russian rule.

Well, the pax americana is at your doorstep now.

Yeah! Heard that one more than a few times.

Trump just wants to party like it’s 1939…

1 Like

And here’s another “AI generated” photo posted by Trump on Truth Social where not only Greenland but Canada also see’s the US Flag planted over the country, so “watch out Mark Carney !!” as Trump is gunning for Canada again. :astonished_face:

At this point, he’s just shit-posting for the LULs.

I pity the journalists who have to follow him and a handful of his accolades on TS and X. And Elon’s X account of course, too.

The Swiss ambassador (or a former one) already aired his frustration about this being the first thing to do in the morning and trying to make sense of it so he can cable back something to Bern…

Pax Americana = supporting NATO countries because stability is good for free trade.

Attacking NATO country because owning is more important than free trade, not Pax Americana.

Hands up all those who want to petition the BBC to send “Not The Nine O’Clock News” reporters to Washington to make sense of Donald Trumps ramblings on Truth Social. :smiley: :rofl: :rofl:

In fact to tell you the truth headline news lately is straight from Not The Nine O’Clock News !!
:joy: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The fun thing is that Greenland left the European Economic Communities (a precursor of the EU) back in 1985. Greenlanders voted in a referendum and the “leave” won. They had their Brexit 40 years ago.

Trump’s admin is literally pushing Greenlanders into the arms of the EU. For a long time, Greenlanders have talked about sovereignty, booo Denmark. Last year…

Jens-Frederik Nielsen, the prime minister of the self-ruling Danish territory, gave the first-ever address by a leader of Greenland to the European Parliament on Wednesday, which he said came toward the end of “a dramatic year for Greenland.”

“The world is changing, and it’s changing fast,” Nielsen said, without directly mentioning the American president’s saber-rattling. “Greenland needs the European Union, and the European Union needs Greenland.”

Calling the EU “a steadfast friend … during challenging times we are going through right now,” Nielsen talked up the island’s vast reserves of rare earths and critical minerals, which he said have the potential to “shift global and security balances” and are ripe for investment.

“Greenland is ready to move with the EU to hasten the pace,” he said, adding that the island was seeking investments from the European Investment Bank in projects “related to infrastructure and raw materials.”

But Nielsen was quick to clarify to reporters after his speech that Greenland would not seek to fully rejoin the bloc. The island left the European Communities, a precursor to the EU, in 1985 after a referendum. While its citizens hold Danish and therefore EU passports, Greenland remains outside the Union.

“Let me say this clear: We are not going to join another country … Right now, we have no plan to be a member of the EU,” he said.

They don’t have oil or rare earth deposists.