I've personally never had any complementary insurance plans, only the basic package yet as I understand it due to the overall lower price of the child insurance and also because children tend to get sick more often, many opt to take max available complementary plans to their newborns.
I am having a question about the complementary dental insurance, more precisely about the coverage for braces.
Is it worth to take it for a newborn in a sense that a child gets permanent teeth in the age of ~7 and braces can be received in the age of ~9?
Ie. does this kind of complementary insurance get re-evaluated every year and the child could be denied it right before reaching the age when it's useful or it actually makes sense to take it when it's not useful and wait until the age it is useful? How does it typically work?
Sorry if there are some unreasonable assumptions/thoughts in my post, zero experience with this topic at all =)
If you have it then insurance cannot be taken away. Personally we had it since birth, others opt to add it later. I have friends whose kid has a condition we're the enamel is super soft and then had to pay out of pocket as insurance would not take them.
Just take a good dental insurance as many are quite expensive for little payout. I quote like Groupe Mutuel. If you search the forum you will find reccomendation.
My wife needed them so we have a reason to suspect it=) In any case it's a part of a dental insurance in general, just trying to choose a reasonable one.