So my French isn't bad, and it's clear what the word means literally, but what exactly does it imply about a piece of land? Is it that it can't be used as building land, or that it could be so used? It's used as a positive feature, but in the context it might be either way round.
In practice, dézonage means to remove from a zone. I think it implies that it's a "building zone". So it;'s something to say that it's NOT removed from a building zone.
To be verified as it could refer to other zone like agricultural, industrial, etc...
In theory, it literally it's not removed from a zone, without specifying which type.
From what I saw, around here, it's implied to be a building zone (where you can build a normal house).
Edit: You forgot to mention the LAT, which is a good reference of what is it talking about.
So the LAT adds the context, it's about law on "amenagement" of territory.
It's was about region having to reduce the zone where one could build (a house, secondary house, etc...)
See> https://translate.google.com/transla...ory%2F22096244
So it's basically saying that all its land were not impacted by LAT, and maintained (so far) their property to build a property on its entirety (the 5548M2). Of course, all normal restrictions applies like not too close to another building, etc...
Nice house btw! A bit pricey and a bit dated imho...
check out with the link below by using the post code:
I think the LAT was to actually "declassify" some zone where one potentially could build, since it was then creating too many empty houses and impacting the housing market in these areas.
So I think, in that context, that expression is reminding that it's not impacted by LAT and it was "not removed from the zone" (the alleged good zone where one could build upon). It clearly mentioned LAT in the original advert, after the expression non dezonee.
That's how I see it, of course, a simple clarification with the one who wrote that will prevail.
Great stuff, and thanks for the explanatory link (better in French, though, than google translose).
Not one we're looking at seriously - the location in the middle of the bits of Diableret ski area is a bit remote from any other major ski regions, and from anywhere else, TBH. But I was intrigued by what it meant.
Certainly very confusing, which is why I asked here, of course but it's the only explanation that makes sense in this case.
When the law came out they dezoned quite a lot of buildable land to non buildable land. They also froze the zones. You'll have a very hard time changing the land use now.
The property was not dezoned meaning it is still buildable. So it could be a valuable selling point.
In the end we gave up on it for a variety of reasons, although we really loved many aspects of the place. https://www.google.com/maps/@46.7608...XA_dZoNgTw!2e0