By the way, I recognize that the US media is obsessed with celebrity gossip crap as well, but I also think that is silly. However, everyone believes that this is silly even if they are interested.
But I am really concerned that you only have 1 English language channel.
CNN can only give you so much, try Cablecom for some good deals.
I can see that for british economy it's good to have such an event attracting a lot of tourists and media. It's basically good PR.
For the british themselves, I'm sure many of the tax payers will tell us what they think about it.
Although I am Australian, the Queen is still my constitutional monarch and I believe that the royal family can unite or tear apart the Commonwealth of nations. And no Commonwealth means no Commonwealth Games that Australia tops...
I also love the history embodied in the royal family. Even when we sightsee we always stop at castles.
I would suggest that there's more of a global interest in the British Royal Family with it's associated pomp and ceremony, that has evolved over hundreds of years, then in a World Series, where the rest of the world (bar one?) is excluded.
Anyway, guv', it's always good to see a proper class system in action.
I have to say that personally I'm not terribly happy about the whole inherited power and status aspect of royalty/gentry and find some of the present royal family very irritating. However, I'll be joining other British folk to watch and making my kids join in because I think the whole Royal/ceremony/history package is still an important part of 'Britishness' and I want my 'british only by passport, never really lived there' children to see part of their 'home' culture.
I saw a bit of the American coverage. They should be ashamed of themselves. Seems that they feel leaving the Commonwealth was a big mistake.
1) When it comes to ceremonial and pomp and circumstance, nobody does it better that the British
2) It is an historic occasion
3) I like weddings
Yes,so many people are not really interested but as the news tends to be gloomy on most fronts it is nice to forget that and have an excuse to focus on happy news and have a day of getting together with friends and have your own day of celebration - and most of all
- Everyone loves a wedding -don't they?
But I guess it appeals to the dreamer in most of us, and the lovers of romance.
I just cannot figure out why Kate looks 10 years older than she actually is.
If you enjoy history, if you enjoy monuments and architecture, if you're interested in centuries of tradition, if you've studied the formidable English history and its impact worldwide (think colonies) you might find the wedding rather fascinating. After all, with the exception of Charlemagne, only Queen Victoria had an empire that was so vast that the sun never set on it.
It's not just the wedding of these two young people, it's who they are, what they represent and all the monarchy stands for.
If you wish to know more about it, you might find reading about the different families who have ascended the throne, rather interesting. Start perhaps with Henry VIIth and the war of Roses between the houses of York and Lancaster and move onwards until today. It's just awesome !!
Cheers,
Nick
I care, because I was born a subject of the Crown. Somewhere along the line, I became a citizen. But it's built into my constitution that my allegiance is to the Royal Family, and, in particular, Brenda (ER II). Just like our cousins across the pond on the whole are obsessed with the flag, and the office of the presidency.
However, I don't care enough to go to the celebrations. I may watch it on TV, unless Quantum Leap is on ITV4.
Aside from that I think it's wonderful to celebrate such a special occasion. Not because it involves royalty but just due to what it stands for. I think it would be such a lovely idea if on weekends a TV channel would broadcast weddings which have been filmed by us, just the average man on the street. Although, it would probably turn into some reality thing and I guess it wouldn't be as appealing as that Gypsy wedding show.