Indeed, congestion pricing as proposed for the Gotthard is already working Stockholm (1SEK ~ 0.1 CHF). The objective is to discourage everyone driving at the same time.
And just for the record: Many of those transit customers already pay 40 CHF for a Vignette which they will use exactly twice: Once on their way to Italy and once back. Austria with their short term vignette is already a lot friendlier to tourists. For those who are not aware: the locals in Uri charge RVs 25 CHFs to park on a highway parking place for the night... only in Switzerland.
2. The Gotthard is actually not the tunnel with the most traffic congestion hours per year in Switzerland. The Gubrist wins by quite a margin. Why not charge the people there? Let me guess: Because the people in the jam there are locals?
Everyone keeps on talking about alternative routes... which ones exactly? The San Bernadino is great if you live in the Zurich area. But for transit coming from Basel is it quite a bit extra. Nobody likes to be in a traffic jam... and neither do the tourists. But there are just very few good ways to cross the Alps, essentially the Gotthard and the Brenner. Pushing up the prices without offering an alternative will only benefit one party: easy jet.
I don't think I could tolerate many more of your posts.
You are not making sense. You state that US roads are falling apart and there's corruption despite them having high toll charges.
Your answer for Switzerland is to have high toll charges too - to what end?
It wouldn't hurt.
This is the interesting issue. If you check online in other languages about the best option to cross the Alps: it's the Gotthard because you only pay the vignette, thus cheap. Mont Blanc and Frejus tunnels in France are not recommended online because "more expensive".
Anyway, I learned to be around Gotthard before 7AM and after 22hh00, and it works fine.
a toll will spread the cost of renovating and building out new solutions onto those using it though.
if you look at the Arlbergtunnel in Austria, it's around €10.50 for a car each way. That does little to reduce the traffic but pays for maintenance. Which takes place every 5 years or so and sends traffic up the pass....
The Ösis do it well though, with an annual Vignette, you get an annual tunnel pass discounted from €100+ to around €65. We have this on two cars because we travel this route often.
And about the price: the Brenner costs 11 EUR single ticket. A ten day vignette in Austria 9.90 EUR. Even if your trip is longer than the ten days and you need two: Pretty much on par with the 40 CHFs, no? The BeNeLux and Western German cars come through the Gotthard because it is simply the by far shortest route. Eastern Germans, Polish go through the Brenner... to change that would the toll need to be in the hundreds if you want to account for the full costs to drive a long diversion. And I absolutely positively dont want them all on the Passstrasse... do we put a toll on that as well?
If we go for the root cause, it's only people wanting to travel days on the same date because holidays. Somehow the school system have organized themselves across regions and countries to shift a bit the start/end dates and this helps to reduce bottlenecks. But, other holidays along the year are on the same date and this is when problems happen.
From here to 2032 there's no relief, and there's a revival in RV culture. RVs don't excel in stop-go traffic in an uphill incline. So, things will get worse, and we'll see if it's only Uri or the rest of cantons joins into enforcing fees.
By 2032, the Gotthard tunnel should have two functioning lanes each direction open to the public.
Exceptions apply, but they require an individual permit.
But only one lane will be used per tunnel when both are open. Capacity by road must not be increased.
There’s an unfortunate detail: back on 1994 there was referendum named “the Alps Initiative”.
https://www.alptransit-portal.ch/en/…nitiative/true
The outcome of this vote became Art. 84 on Swiss Constitution. The bottleneck is not a mistake, it’s by design.
https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1999/404/en#art_84
So far, the plan is to only have 1 very wide lane in each tunnel in each direction in order to comply with Swiss constitution.
Of course, the restriction from 1994 was a result of popular vote. Another popular vote could make possible to have 2 lanes in each direction. Trucks from 1994 are very different from trucks today. The new Gotthard rail tunnel is there, not sure how many more containers can be transported by train instead of truck. There’s also the limit to cargo trains during night because noise. So, a whole mess.
It always amused me to see Germans filling up with petrol just before crossing the border into Switzerland when petrol was a good 20 cts cheaper on the Swiss side.
If I was retired, with a camper van, there's no way I'd go to Italy in peak season but there lies another problem - many campsites in Italy have a relatively short season and are closed at other times.
They are not supposed to be a holiday from religion!