First floor no incentive to get one, 2nd little so sounds as a not very likely scenario.
We are a couple 59/60, I broke my back 3 years ago, having stairs keeps you fit in old age, if I can't manage 5-6 flights then it's time for EXIT. Crutches are fine for stairs, wheel chairs are the issue.
Our winter home is 160m2 ground floor flat wheel chair friendly with a garden, I thought having to dig snow oneself with a chalet on 3 floors was less attractive.
I am fit and take the stairs as much as I can and we lived for 3 yrs on 4th without a lift when we were younger.
It will be fine "most" of the time and then it will not...
1) Deliveries are often to the door and people want to be paid more to lug stuff up to 4th floor
2) not fun going Up and down with holiday lugagge
3) recently our lift was broken and our old dog cannot do stairs, not fun carrying 25kg up and down several times a day
4) husband got an issue with his foot and cannot do stairs now
The list goes on.... I know we cannot plan life thinking of the worse but for a purchase of that price... Nah
As for maintenance costs, we paid more for a service on our heat pump in our previous house than we do for the lift.
Exactly my thoughts- we'll probably get used to the view and everything else, probably even the daily up/down the stairs as long as we're fit- but if any of us broke our leg, we'll really miss something as basic as lift!!
Do you know roughly how much did it cost for the complete installation?
That being said, even if all the neighbours sign off, things can still go pear shaped during the approval process at the gemeinde.
If the sellers were smart they would get permission officially and sell the unit with the building permit.
If other houses are available for 3 mil, extra 500k is not something you are paying our of the pocket, it will be max 100k (20%) initially and additional 75k (total 35%) till you retire, Rest is funded by bank which you are not expected to pay.
So basically if you invest 100k (175) more you can then get a 'dream' apartment , and from the comments above it is clear that this 175k will probably not get you a lift in this apartment.
The other points may be overcome with a cash payment...
But not (always) if they are on the lowest lift floor - I know one friend who didn't. No idea how common this is.
But my point was that the building cost-share rules can be amended to say this if that's the cost of getting it done. It's easy to see why an owner who gets zero benefit from a lift wouldn't want to pay for it.
This may in turn also make the property expensive to shift due to the high NK of the lift over time.
I see the lift costs for my building and the people who claim not to use it spent a lot of oxygen on discussions that they should pay zero or less. Lift operating costs and maintenance are expensive.
You can rent a lift to move in and out.
My advice: buy without, spend the money on an Apple watch and close your rings every day....!!!
We used it when we moved in and again when we moved out.
I almost always take the stairs in hotels. Free exercise - what's not to like?
What is maddening is that a few hotels I have used in the U.S. have stairs that miss the ground floor entirely and stop one floor below that in a gated and locked outside area below the ground floor.
The stairs are basically for emergency use as an exit only.