when we were in Australia, we were appaled that locals would eat kangaroo, as we preceived it as a cute family animal whilst we learned they are considered a "pest" and happily eaten
Learning for us on open mindness (and the kangaroo tasted good too)
But I could not willingly eat dog or cat, honestly cannot explain it rationally, but I draw the line @ dogs and cats
Or those cute piglets, which make delicious suckling pigs once grilled.
I think I can survive without having tried dog- or cat meat but they are not more or less "human" that the other animals we raise just to kill and eat them.
If you knew how they kill dogs in Korea, to ensure that adrenalin flows beforehand to make the meat tender- perhaps you would NOT (but yes I can agree that it is hypocritical to eat some meat and not other - but good husbandry and as stressfree slaughter is another matter).
I won't put any info or videos on here, as it is just too shocking and sick- but intense suffering before the kill seems essential for tenderness
(it involves slow cooking alive, or heavy beating for some time before hanging alive to slowly suffocate).
BTW, there is horse, and horse, and you usually won't know. Both the old horses the local farmer had to be put down because of laminitis (deformation of the feet which causes painful lameness). They both ended up at our local horse butchers, and must have been quite tough.
I started eating horse in Migros in ZH. I did not speak German & thought it was a peppered steak. Tasted really nice & tender, better than any Beef I ever ate.
I ate whale once - by accident - we were broke in Norway and the cheapest meat was "hvalbif". Ah, ha - beef. We only worked it out when it tasted fishy & I checked the dictionary. Too late to save it, we finished the plate, but I can't recommend it.
1. i applaud the good horse puns. there's nothing quite like a good pun. and given the subject matter of this thread, i will challenge any neigh sayer to refute my statement.
2. the moral relativity of one species to eat as ok the other as "barbaric" is very silly to me. it is the natural order of primates to eat meat, we are by nature omnivorous so its natural for us to eat other animals. It seems to me that as long as the nature of the animal is respected (not factory farmed) and the animal lives in some capacity as it is evolved to, whatever the animal is seems sort of irrelevant.
frankly, in this day and age with our current "post nationalism" western values, it seems like any meat consumption is technically unethical. But everyone does it, its delicious to many of us, is tradition, and so we do it and try not to think about it so much.
I would love to give up meat, indeed the mrs. and i rarely eat mammals of any kind except for cuts of bacon. Who can live without bacon? I cant but i wish i could. I'm sure those pigs which die in violence so i can make sunday brunch do too.
3. re: Appenzeller dog sausage, when i heard about that i thought to myself "wow appenzell must've been very poor for a very long time if that sort of thing became tradition."
Boy do I love me an ethnocentrist. Those words like 'barbarian' and 'uncivilized' just throw me right back to my first year anth classes, talking about cultural relativity and avoiding observer bias...
And, I might add, to my time in China where they eat dog, cat, bugs, horses, and just about everything and anything edible, and call the west 'uncivilized barbarians' because of our shallow history, incomprehensible and short-lived cultures, terrible penmanship, inedible cuisine, huge noses, repulsive body odor and ridiculously large feet.
I personally agree with the humane line - if you eat meat, and said meat is humanely slaughtered, then what matter if some people keep those animals as pets? Not my place to judge their eating habits, especially since I'm such an avid consumer of the spoiled milk products that I'm told all truly civilized people eschew.