Always seemed weird to me, but the rule's the rule...
Yeah, my dad got told off by a policeman in the States for jaywalking. That was back in the 50s/60s.
Tom
If you go somewhere bigger you will make a different observation.
A bit like comparing pedestrians in Zürich with pedestrians in say, Rothrist.
I friend of mine jay walked at a red light in Germany once and didn't see there was a policemen behind him. The policeman waited until the light turned green and then ran to catch him. If that isn't police ethics for you . The policemen didn't scold him for crossing at a red light, but for doing so so blatantly in front of a policeman. He got away with a verbal warning and never heard of the matter again.
So if you want to jaywalk, look behind you first to make sure there isn't a policeman watching.
I'm a bit shocked that walking on to a highway is only a Fr. 20.00 fine as well. In Germany even only Euro 10.00.
And by the way, omtatsat, Konstanz is crawling with Swiss. It's a bit like the Chinese in Switzerland. Not representative at all.
Walking over the crosswalk in red is like smoking pot
Don't spoil the citizen! Better to plan better, then I don't have to go over the pedestrian strip when it is red
Pedestrian strips are designed to protect pedestrians. And don't hinder. But that's exactly what they do when they have traffic lights. You steal lifetime. There is no car far and wide. But I should wait. And wait. And still waiting.
Do you really stand alone in the rain just because a little red man you don't even know plays up in front of you and orders you to wait?
Certainly not. So I start running - and I don't feel guilty. A car that goes red at the traffic lights causes chaos. A pedestrian who walks through the traffic lights at red does something for his health.
Clearly there are rules. Never, really never, you do that in front of a child. After all, this requires the protection of the zebra crossing. And yes, you don't do that to the police either. It is their job to follow the law. Testing whether they will pay or not is a senseless provocation. But don't be afraid: there will never be a penalty. Going over the pedestrian crossing in red is like smoking pot today: both are established in a majority of the population. Sanctions, on the other hand, will not last long.
I never got a fine. But I live with being shouted at sometimes. But that only happened when I lived in Germany. Germany has the can deposit. And Germany has citizens who like to authoritatively instruct their fellow citizens about the prevailing legal situation. Good citizens stop at red on the sidewalk. Everything else is resistance to the authority of the state.
But we Swiss have no can deposit. We have sidewalks instead of sidewalks. And we manage our problems with personal responsibility. We leave the decision, entirely militia system, to the citizen on the sidewalk. His life is worth something to him. Where it is dangerous and sensible, every pedestrian waits.
There is a simple law: where the pedestrian does not wait, the planning did not take him seriously. For example at the Solothurn main station. Sorry, this is a two-leg disaster. It presses, the SBB are not waiting for you. But you have to wait forever. Car after car. A huge main traffic axis cuts the direct pedestrian connection from the city to the train. And not only that: this street is the unnecessary loop around the neck of the old town. It contracts. That has to change quickly. It also applies to the planning: if you stay with red for too long, you will miss the train at the end and will not get any further.
"Where it is dangerous and sensible, every pedestrian waits."
The clue is on the page . There is a catalogue of fines, payable if caught and if the police officer feels so inclined . You also pay a fine if you bring in your library book late . It’s what in German they call an Ordnungswidrigkeit . It is enshrined in contractual statutes and bylaws and not in criminal or even civil law.
Factually , any smart lawyer can get you off the hook for paying with some simple tricks . Of course it would cost you more than you save , but that’s not the issue here.
Ordnungswidrigkeit. HaHa. Thats from the last century. They still have not got around to revising it.