Retire at 30 in Switzerland?

A few months ago, I met a doctor called Nicolas. Today, I saw there was an article about him in the newspaper:

Assistant doctor today, retired tomorrow

He wants to retire at the age of 30 – and is saving radically to achieve this

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla doesn’t care about restaurants or expensive vacations. This is supposed to enable him to retire early. But can it really work? The 29-year-old gives us a glimpse into his budget.

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla sits in a kitchen holding a book about financial independence, Basel, August 2025.

A working life in fast forward: Nicolas Parzy-Jagla wants to retire after eight years as a doctor.

Photo: Dominik Plüss

Shortly :

  • A 29-year-old intern is planning his early retirement at 30 by minimizing his consumption.
  • By investing in real estate and funds, he will generate 3,000 francs in monthly passive income.
  • Financial experts warn of the risks of early retirement without the option to return.

Ten people are sitting together at the Tramdepot restaurant in Bern: nine men and one woman. Only some of the group order beer, fries, and tarte flambée. Others, as one young man puts it, “avoid commercial consumption” and order nothing.

Instead of spending their money, they talk in English about how to grow it as efficiently as possible. With equity funds, cryptocurrencies. Or would it be better to invest in real estate? “I’d have to deal with the tenants, which isn’t for me,” says the owner of an IT company.

The group meets several times a year at their local pub. The theme is the same every evening: the dream of Fire. The acronym stands for “Financial Independence, Retire Early.”

The goal: to retire at 30, 40, or 50. The plan: to work for one or two decades, earn as much as possible, invest as much as possible, reduce expenses to a minimum, and then retire.

Chagai Friedlander, Jochen Bergmann and Boris Krstic from the FIRE movement in a conversation over food and drinks on July 22, 2025 in Bern.

The group at the Bern tram depot exchanges ideas about investment strategies and a frugal lifestyle. But every now and then, they also indulge in a little luxury, like a tarte flambée.

Photo: Raphael Moser

The goal is to make ends meet for decades with so-called passive income. Instead of a salary, daily living expenses are covered by interest from investments. Many Fire followers maintain a frugal lifestyle before and after early retirement, managing their finances accordingly.

The movement began in Canada, where software engineer and blogger Peter Adeney, aka Mr. Money Mustache, made it popular in 2011. Fire followers now exchange ideas worldwide in online forums. Or they meet in person, like the group in Bern. Not everyone wants to retire significantly early—some are simply interested in investment strategies. For others, Fire is more of an ideal, yet unattainable for them.

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla, on the other hand, is already very close to his goal. He initiated the meetings at the tram depot a good three years ago. The 29-year-old intern has since moved from Bern to Basel.

No gym membership, no expensive restaurants

Here, near the University Hospital, he lives in a 30-square-meter shared apartment. A table, a bed, a sofa, and a television he bought from a colleague for 200 Swiss francs. Everything is inexpensive, everything saves space. “I don’t need much,” he says. His appearance is also unfussy: round glasses and simple clothing.

“People buy things just to impress others; I don’t want that kind of life.” So he doesn’t have a gym membership—jogging is free. He doesn’t go on expensive vacations—his last trip to Genoa with Flixbus and a rental apartment cost 400 Swiss francs. He doesn’t go to fancy restaurants—he can eat for free in the hospital cafeteria during his shift.

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla sits in his cozy living room in Basel. He is a follower of the FIRE movement and aims to be financially independent in a year.

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla lives in a small space and with cheap furniture.

Photo: Dominik Plüss

As a junior doctor, Parzy-Jagla earns CHF 7,500 net per month. He invests CHF 6,000, a smaller portion in exchange-traded index funds and a larger portion in apartments. He now owns seven apartments in Mulhouse, France.

In the border town where he grew up, “the best of both worlds come together,” as he says. Real estate prices are affordable; he invested around €100,000 per apartment. And the numerous cross-border commuters are willing to pay higher rents.

He plans to retire from working life in just one year. He’ll be just 30 by then. He wants to pay off his last two apartments by then. He’ll have 900,000 francs set aside. This will allow him to pay himself a passive income of 3,000 francs per month.

Matura at 14 years

Even in his school career, the French-born man took bigger steps than others. His parents homeschooled him, allowing him to skip several grades, and he graduated from high school at just 14. He studied medicine at an international university in Romania and came to Switzerland as a junior doctor seven years ago. “That’s when the harsh reality caught up with me.”

The working hours are “extremely long.” At peak times, he says, 70-hour weeks are sometimes on the agenda. And: “You spend more time on the computer than with the patients.” All the pressure has made him numb.

Now he’s opting for Plan B: retiring after eight years. Is that responsible in times when there’s a shortage of doctors everywhere? Of course, he sometimes feels guilty. “But I don’t want to pay for the failure of politicians.” More doctors need to be trained, and better working conditions are needed to keep people in the profession, he believes.

From 100 to zero, then, and yet Parzy-Jagla isn’t afraid of falling into a hole. “I won’t be a typical retiree,” he says with a laugh. He still has so much planned. Understanding the universe better, perhaps taking astronomy courses, making a film, learning Japanese.

The most important thing in life is time, he says. “I don’t want to let my youth simply pass me by.” Even after Fire, he’ll have to budget frugally. CHF 3,000 a month isn’t much for a life in Switzerland. “But in 90 percent of countries, you can live comfortably on that.” He could imagine living in Asia or southern Europe.

This is what the financial expert says

Very few people embrace such a radical lifestyle as Parzy-Jagla’s; the Fire movement is a fringe phenomenon. Opinions on the subject are divided in the financial industry. “The concept is associated with considerable risks,” says Christian Gugger of VZ Vermögenszentrum Bern, for example . Depending on the circumstances, a return to work could be difficult, and the impact on retirement assets would be significant.

And: Anyone who wants to live off the returns from invested money is at the mercy of the fluctuations of the financial markets: “You have to be able to tolerate these uncertainties.” Nowadays, investments with higher risks are necessary, as safe investments hardly yield anything anymore due to the current interest rate situation.

Blogger and financial influencer Angela Mygind – known as Miss Finance – is also skeptical. She considers the movement’s goals extreme and difficult to implement in reality. “Anyone who wants to save so radically is quickly forced into social isolation.”

Nevertheless, many of the aspects it covers are interesting. Fire is a lifestyle that questions consumer society. Knowing how to live more frugally and invest wisely is beneficial for everyone. “Those who delve so deeply into their own finances can discover what’s truly important to them in life.”

How to become financially independent

However, there is controversy over how much one actually needs to save to be able to enjoy the desired retirement. The so-called 4 percent rule is considered a rule of thumb among Fire followers. It was introduced by American financial advisor William Bengen in 1994.

It states that the assets of a person who wants to retire early must be 25 times their annual expenses to achieve financial independence. “The calculation is based on investing your assets in such a way that you can withdraw 4 percent annually until the end of your life without affecting your capital,” explains Christian Gugger from the Wealth Center.

Both Gugger and Mygind have concerns: “Mathematically, this sounds good, but in practice, financial planning is much more complex,” says the expert. For example, the rule is not aligned with the Swiss franc and is subject to inflation.

For financial expert Christian Gugger, Fire is most likely to be implemented if a larger inheritance can be expected later or if the company continues to work on a small scale despite everything – this would then be a so-called Barista Fire.

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla, assistant physician and supporter of the FIRE movement, in Basel on August 5, 2025.

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla will soon no longer need his lab coat. Whether he will turn his back on medicine for good remains uncertain.

Photo: Dominik Plüss

Nicolas Parzy-Jagla also doesn’t completely rule out returning to work at some point. After all, he does want children, and his passive income isn’t enough to support a whole family. He could imagine working a 20 percent job, for example. Perhaps he’ll even return to working as a doctor at some point. “Simply on my terms.”

3 Likes

Interesting guy. I’ve read other FIRE stories and some people who “retired” in their 30s got a little bored and found out there was more to life. I also think we’re not getting the full picture with this guy, because the numbers sound a little bit too good to be true.

in what way? earning €3000 per month seems fairly modest and barely enough to pay all the bills in Switzerland.

reading between the lines, it seems he was pushed a bit hard in his childhood, so i’m glad he can take a bit of time to relax.

1 Like

The comments were pretty savage: https://bronze-user-7y3c.pagedrop.io/

Basic math seems a bit off, unless he had a bit of help getting started or he’s also a whiz kid investor. Odds are he didn’t make mad cash when he was a student in Romania, so most of his money has come from his salary as an assistant doctor. He said he has saved/invested 6K/month for the past 7 years. Chat GPT says that even at 7% interest on investments he’d only have 732K by the time he’s 30. But somehow he’s already invested 700K in apartments that are nearly paid off, and will have 900K in cash by the time he’s 30 next year? Where’s he investing to get those kind of returns?

1 Like

I assume the retirement is not in Switzerland. Probably living in one the apartments in Mulhouse. Without paying rent and losing the income of renting 1 apartment, the 3’000 CHF/month are not that bad.

I guess the real magic here is how to minimize rental income taxes in France to make the schema work :laughing:

I think the 900k is total wealth (properties plus investments). plus if he invested primarily in property to begin with, he would have a large amount of leverage from mortgage. e.g. if he puts 10% down, earns 10% yield and buys a new property once he has 30k equity:

Year Savings # of Houses Total Equity (k) Outstanding Mortgage (k) Annual Rental Income + annual savings (k)
1 0 3 78 222 95
2 9 5 160 340 111
3 0 7 271 429 127
4 0 7 381 319 127
5 0 7 495 205 127
6 0 7 615 85 127
7 40 7 700 0 127

That’s sad. The working hours of doctors are awful. Can’t fault the guy for realizing it’s a hamster wheel for life. It would be nice if doctors could work 40-45 hours per week. They wouldn’t be as scarce if society didn’t treat them that bad.

Also, managing 7 (or 9?) apartments is not exactly “retirement”. The nasty comments miss this, or people also think managers of rental properties are parasites.

when i was working in london, I had a new trainee:

  • she had trained for 7 years or whatever it took to become a doctor
  • and had to work 100 hour weeks
  • she coudn’t hack it and quit after a year
  • she joined my firm where she had to start at the bottom and be a trainee for another 3 years (as a trainee accountant)

That would make more sense, but I suspect the article is written to make people think he started with zero 7 years ago and will have 900K and 7 apartments next year. It’s also written in a way that would make the haters come out of the woodwork.

While I’m disappointed to see someone go through that level of training and work just to quit after 8 years, he is young enough and qualified enough to go back into the workforce at some point should he want to. I’m more disppointed that he’s leaving the profession - we really need more doctors. AI isn’t going to replace them, at least not entirely.

3 Likes

This is the point that keeps bothering me.

I realize that I would probably react differently if the story highlighted a private equity bro. I’d probably say 'good for him, get out of a soulless industry by 30, while you still have some humanity left".

But it feels different when a doctor drops out - and I admit that my reaction is not fair.

Off topic from FIRE discussion, It begs a larger question though: In countries where the state pays for tiertiary education, should there be a ‘payback to society’ time? When a medical educaton in Switzerland is estimated to cost 500K, and the need for doctors is so great, it’s a tempting idea. But one cannot ask that of those educated in one field if we don’t ask that of those educated in all fields. 'Tis a puzzlement.

I suppose an answer would be to recognize that doctors are like everyoe else - some will leave the profession early, some will work part time, some might never practice - and adjust the numerus clausus accordingly. We need to accept that lifelong full time work is no longer a given, train more doctors, and make desperately needed but lower paid ranks of the profession - GPs - more actractive. How to do that? Sadly, no idea.

But back to FIRE…

2 Likes

No, not least because it would create yet another bureaucratic monster without gain.

Even if he stops practising he’ll probably work in a related field, and be more productive thanks to the education. So it’ll still reflect in his output.

What you could do is some requirement on tax paid, but the same would need to apply to other studies including the notoriously breadless humanities.

Who cares about person who doesn’t have kids and only worked 8 years as a doctor before retirement? He won’t leave any trace in history and will be forgotten soon.

Wow.

1 Like

The easy answer would be to charge the marginal cost of education. Then people can make their own assessment of whether it is worth it or not. This might make the system more efficient when combined with loans that only pay back after reaching certain salary limits.

Not only a puzzle, it’s a Pandora’s box. Should these women also pay back to society?

Statistically, it’s not a big deal according to survey from Swiss Federal Statistics Office. So, why look under the hood when the car is running fine?

93% of tertiary graduates are working in an activity that corresponds to their level of education or professional qualifications one year after completing their studies.

1 Like

From the article: “I can organise my day the way I want.”. LOL, really? First you plan your activities around your kid’s sleeping schedule than you plan your activities around your kid’s KiGa/school and after school activities schedule. Switzerland is not the country when stay-at-home mom can plan her own time, since the kids come home every few hours.

Someone should tell them about blockzeiten and Hort. Game-changer!

Yes, but if you have to plan work after that, it is even worse.

LOL. Who cares not leaving a trace in history? I for example have not one Trumpian streak in me.

On the other hand you don’t have to drive them around all day long … to school, to football, to a friend’s place, to the “Badi” …

A kid like me you wouldn’t see all day. My foster-parents didn’t even get up for me in the morning; got my alarm-clock, grabbed something to eat in the kitchen and off I was. Short meet at lunch-time and I had to be home at 18.00h.

However, back to retiring. I still wouldn’t call being a housewife with a lazy husband (domestically) and a bunch of kids being equal to retirement. But Axa’s post was more about educational costs not being put straight back into society.