Top 50 cities: Quality of living ranking - Zurich #2, Geneva #3

SOURCE

Vienna retains the top spot as the city with the world’s best quality of living, according to the Mercer 2010 Quality of Living Survey . Zurich and Geneva follow in second and third position, respectively, while Vancouver and Auckland remain joint fourth in the rankings.

Mercer conducts the ranking to help governments and multi-national companies compensate employees fairly when placing them on international assignments. The rankings are based on a point-scoring index, which sees Vienna score 108.6 and Baghdad 14.7. Cities are ranked against New York as the base city, with an index score of 100.

Mercer’s quality of living factors

Political and Social Environment

Relationship with other Countries Internal Stability Crime Law Enforcement Ease of Entry and Exit Economic Environment

Currency Exchange Regulations Banking Services Socio-Cultural Environment Limitation on Personal Freedom Media and Censorship Medical and Health Considerations

Hospital Services Medical Supplies Infectious Diseases Water Potability Sewage Waste removal Air Pollution Troublesome and Destructive Animals and Insects Schools and Education Schools Natural Environment

Climate Record of Natural Disasters Public Services and Transport

Electricity Water Availability Telephone Mail Public Transport Traffic Congestion Airport Recreation Variety of Restaurants Theatrical and Musical Performances Cinemas Sport and Leisure Activities Consumer Goods

Meat and Fish Fruits and Vegetables Daily Consumption Items Alcoholic Beverages Automobiles Housing Housing Household Appliances

and Furniture Household Maintenance

and Repair

..and once again, I don't believe that this study is conducted in a manner where you can derive a real quality of living figure...as emphasis is made on matters that hardly affect the real quality of living of a person.

That's quite interesting, many of them are important to me and do affect my quality of life. I would be happy to hear what areas you would like to see included.

I note that they did not include..

Price of a Rum and Coke

Availability of a decent English Breakfast

Thickness of walls and loudness of apartment neighbours.

The length of skirts and tightness of Jeans.

All of these are vital.

Well, duh! Any survey that has Zürich above Basel is quite simply fundamentally flawed.

It's obvious really.

...no but in terms to derive a real value you need to include the right figures such as:

-traffic per capita

-availability of goods and services

-availabilty of facilities such as gyms (YMCA types, where you can engage in activities without being a part of a club)

-urban polution (i.e, graffity, littering and general ugliness of the place)

-the real crime figures (including harassment which clearly isn't part of the police work here or simply the recording of not so severe crimes)

-availability of appartments

-open economy

...such factors for instance.

I think all that stuff is already in there.

Certainly a lot of it...

..then Zurich and Geneva wouldn't be 2nd and 3rd.

..yeah like what? Availability of goods and services? Like for instances how there are hardly any opening hours..and establishments have a 30% surcharge on food purchased passed a certain time in the evening..is that part of your idea of quality of life?

Probably why Zurich didn't get #1 spot. I am sure they took all that into consideration and deducted accordingly.

Zurich #2, Geneva #3..

So Basel #1.. YAY BASEL! FCB FCB! Inferno!!

This is great news, and what a honest survey from a reputable organisation.

What? Basel is number... NOT ON THE LIST.

BOO silly survey.

CK

...and that is probably the same way Mercer people assumed certain figures when they did the study.

What did they probably assume ?

and Madrid gets place 48 - ridiculous! How does CR9 stand it there if it is so bad?

...everything.

UptheHatters2008 - you're never going to convince LIB that Zurich (or any Swiss city) is anywhere an list of top places to live.

See: Backwards Switzerland if you don't believe me.

Point taken.

Errrm - did you assume that ?

Adelaide is #32 therefore the study is not only wrong the author should be locked up. Have they even been to Adelaide?

I'd sooner cut off my left nut than live there.

..nope, that's a fact.