A cousin who lives permanently in Hong Kong sent a Louis Vuitton bag (a copy) to me by post. Parcel was stopped by customs and they informed LV Switzerland. Now LV sent a letter asking 900 chf, or they will go ``further``.
The good thing is that I did not admit waiting a parcel, I denied having ordered something like that. On the parcel there is no sender. Only my address on it. Can LV press charges with only the recipients name on the parcel?
Should I pay what they ask? Do they really have a case, since this item was never in my possession??
Thanks. However, I wonder, how this should be handled. I mean that it is crazy. Can they press charges to a recipient even if he never made use of the item?
In this respect, would they press charges even to Angel Merkel if there was was a parcel for her containing such items? How is it possible to blame the recipient? This can be a deliberate action.... and anyone can be a victim ...
I would tell them that this was a gift. And that you had no part is choosing or sending this item and that you are not paying. Start by saying no and then see what they say. At the end if you have to pay, you at least tried.
No its not crazy. Its perfectly simple. Fakes are illegal here. You got sent a fake. It got stopped. They have your address. They will go after you. There is no point coming after you after you got the item. Its much simpler never to give it to you in the first place
Just tell LV that if they don't drop the case (action against you) your friend will send them one fake each day, and they will be fined CHF 900 & prosecuted by Switzerland for trading in fake handbags!
Isn't this a ridiculous situation? I would go to the Schlichtungsbehörde and ask LV to explain how can they charge you with receiving a present.
It is crazy, why should she pay? LV is just bullying, do they really have a case? Are they just hoping that people are sufficiently scared to not take it to court that they pay up?
How can people be ok with this? LV are trying to rob the OP of 900chf for not receiving a parcel, the crime was commited by someone else. What crime has she commited, it's def not receiving stolen goods or anything, because she didn't receive it.
My guess is that LV just hands cases like these to some shady debt collectors who use intimidation to extract money.
Well, one can certainly try. Keep us updated what happens.
But as I said, if this thing goes to court, the 900 CHFs will look cheap.
Also, the courts are not stupid.
They have seen this and a dozen variants a hundred times before.
Nobody gets sent fake LV bags out of the blue.
Do you want to lie about that in front of a judge?
Would you deposit an affidavit under oath that you don't have any connections to Honkong?
What about if they sub-poena all your communication-records?
Unlikely? Perhaps. But you never now if they want to make an example of you. After all, they can be pretty sure to find something and you have to pay all the bills for everything.
Even if it was true, ie the cousin did sent it out of the blue, they wont believe her. Everybody likes receiving surprise parcels. But the courts heard all that before and they wont care
I strongly disagree with all those saying to just pay up. It's stupid.
I will be in HK in a few weeks and I'm going to mail you all fake LV walets and handbags. Hah. I'll cut a deal with LV to split the money 50/50. But don't worry; the extacy tablets will cheer you up in my next parcel.